VC analyst interview questions

Im a first year analyst at a PE firm, want to switch over to VC. Have a first round interview coming up with a largish VC firm. What sorts of questions should I expect? How many rounds of interviews are there generally? What sort of compensation should I expect if Im offered one? How many hours per week would you estimate?

Background: Im coming from a growth/expansion capital PE firm in the lower middle market, and have experience that is broad enough to make me think that my experience is pretty comparable to this other position - the maximum investment amounts in the different companies is actually comparable. Thanks in advance for the advice.

 

I got asked the following...

Why VC? Which portfolio companies of ours are would you most interested in following, and why? What deal experience do you have within XYZ industry (whatever they focus on)? Follow-up questions based on the deal you answered to previous question -- role, challenges of transaction, valuation multiples, outcome, etc.

Didn't make it to offer stage so don't have much more information for you... interviewed mentioned they work ~60 hrs or so a week. I would suspect that the questions I gave are probably similar to the ones that your current company asks.

 

which companies you like right now that you'd invest in and why? where in which sector do you see opportunities, how will that change in 3 years? how would you screen potential opportunities? Stages of VC execution process and what happens at each stage?

cubiclecrowd.com blog.cubiclecrowd.com
 

just try to dig in to his decision process, and how he manages the firm..

Chances are, if you haven't really thought about VC much, you will look like a noob regardless. Just my experience from coaching underclassmen. Can be really hard to fake knowledge / experience with these kinda things..

based on that, I highly recommend to just ask him what you really want to know... If you just want a job, ask him more about that.

 
Vontropnats:
Got a meeting with a VC partner next week -- I don't know much about VC at all (I mean, I know what it is, but nothing technical).

Any recommendations for literature I should read before then? Anything technical I really need to know?

Thanks all.

would definitely check out our best discussions on VC in our FAQ section.

 

Think of why you wanna do it. The partner will not ask you how to calculate an option recharge in a cap table with warrant coverage, convertible debt, and other bells and whistles.

Why VC: - Love the sector - Passion for entrepreneurship - Working with smart and driven people that have similar interest - Help build companies - Follow companies through investment cycle - Operational aspect when working with portfolio co on particular project. - Etc.

Make sure you know the macro trends of the fund space. Know the recent deals (acquisition, IPO, financings).

Think through and show passion, that's the only way you'll get traction.

Aei ho theos geōmetreî
 

VC interviews are hugely variable. You can see some of the common questions here: http://www.askivy.net/articles/venture-capital/interview-preparation/to… and here: http://www.investopedia.com/articles/financial-careers/08/venture-capit…

Anything's on the table though. The biggest curveball I got was when an interviewer asked me which of their portfolio companies I hated. All of the interviews I did weren't very technical, but the potential is always there.

Given your background, I think the most likely thing that you'll really need to polish if your answer to "Why VC?" You need to demonstrate a very clear passion for technology and a good reason for going into VC instead of the startup world.

Happy to talk more if it's helpful.

 

Try to make it as organic as possible; ask about things that you're genuinely interested in. Do they have an investment you find interesting? Ask about it. Do they something a bit differently than other VC firms? Ask about it.

I typically start that portion of the interview with a generic "I'd love to hear about how you've gotten to where you are today". It gets the conversations flowing, they kind of expect it, and it opens up other potential avenues of conversation if you're listening attentively.

Of course, if you can do it without sounding like an idiot, it's always a good idea to ask about the job itself. Not all VC positions are the same. Sourcing responsibility is probably the biggest variable.

Please don't ask about their favorite experience.

 

One of the first things you want to find out is whether the VC firm is sourcing heavy, due diligence heavy, or portfolio company heavy. I knew the place I was interviewing for focused a great deal of time on due diligence, so I made sure that my examples would showcase ways I would add value to the due diligence process of the firm. We also work very closely with the entrepreneurs in our portfolios, so demonstrating that I could effectively build and deepen relationship with an entrepreneur was key.

I would imagine that the greatest portion of your interview will center on the tech sector. Showcase your understanding of the industry, have strong, sound, and articulate opinions about some companies in your radar, and come off as genuinely interested and passionate about the field. Since you don't have much real world experience at this point, also make sure you have a very compelling case as to why you want to do venture capital. Having a crisp and genuine story will be the critical hook for your interview.

As far as technicals go, it really depends on the VC firm. My interview was not very technical, although I did get a question as to how I would value a company that didn't have positive cash flows...By no means it won't be as grueling as typical PE or IB interviews, but familiarity with accounting and valuation methods is a good idea. Be familiar with how to run a DCF, apply (tech-related) multiples, and valuation methodologies that venture capitalists typically employ. I doubt it will get this technical, but you never know, and it's better to err on the side of caution. A good place to start is Prof. Damodaran's website. It's free and he goes into early-stage company valuations.

Hope this is helpful. Gluck.

Capitalist
 

@esbanker: Thanks for your advice! My interview is in a couple of days' time, so I'm trying to read up as much as possible on VC industry since I've been so focused on IB in the past 1 year.

A few questions: - How do you tell whether the VC firm places emphasis on which aspect of the job based from the website? (sourcing, DD, portfolio company support) - Is my explanation correct for the question on 'valuing a company that does not have positive cash flows'?

"For early-stage tech companies with negative FCF, you can use the revenue multiplier method or the modified DCF method.

Let's start with the revenue multiplier method. Companies can generate revenue even when they have negative FCF. This method is based on market-driven multiples from comparable companies that is applied to the subject company's revenue level. It is especially for firms which have high R&D expenditures and no earnings record.

For the modified DCF method, a market-derived revenue multiple is applied to the expected revenues for the terminal year in deriving the terminal value for the exit multiple method. The discount rate used is CAPM, and you discount all future FCF back to year 0 using the discount rate.

However, since VC firms tend to invest in private companies, there is usually a discount of around 30% in value due to liquidity and transparency issues."

I'll definitely read up more on market outlook for tech industry. I'm familiar with DCF and the usual valuation methods employed by VC firms. Thanks again!

 

I've spent the last year working for a seed-stage VC firm.

VC is all about exposing weakness. Most of the time, these firms are composed of people who've developed an app or service that's going to "revolutionize" or "compliment" some segment of an industry. Analysis of their management team's competencies (does anyone on their executive team have any experience in finance/strategy/mgmt experience?) and doing extensive diligence into the "pro-forma" statements they've developed internally, market share potential, etc.. is key. Much of the value lies in securing profits associated with patents they've developed or are in the process of developing.

Most of these guys have no clue how to properly model a pro-forma income statement, let alone forecast an industry segment's growth potential and market opportunity. Take nothing they give you at face value.

The funding process is very rudimentary and valuations are typically based on EBITDA and/or Revenue multiples of precedent transaction of firms in similar spheres. Access to CapIQ was essential for me.

Bottom line: determine how this firm plans to make money and whether it's realistic given their management team's background (along with that of your general/limited partners). You really need an entrepreneurial mindset and an innate business acumen to do well in VC.

 
BuckTurgidson:

I've spent the last year working for a seed-stage VC firm.

VC is all about exposing weakness. Most of the time, these firms are composed of people who've developed an app or service that's going to "revolutionize" or "compliment" some segment of an industry. Analysis of their management team's competencies (does anyone on their executive team have any experience in finance/strategy/mgmt experience?) and doing extensive diligence into the "pro-forma" statements they've developed internally, market share potential, etc.. is key. Much of the value lies in securing profits associated with patents they've developed or are in the process of developing.

Most of these guys have no clue how to properly model a pro-forma income statement, let alone forecast an industry segment's growth potential and market opportunity. Take nothing they give you at face value.

The funding process is very rudimentary and valuations are typically based on EBITDA and/or Revenue multiples of precedent transaction of firms in similar spheres. Access to CapIQ was essential for me.

Bottom line: determine how this firm plans to make money and whether it's realistic given their management team's background (along with that of your general/limited partners). You really need an entrepreneurial mindset and an innate business acumen to do well in VC.

You work at a seed stage VC firm and use EBITDA and precedent transactions to value your investments? Uhhh, ok...

 
BuckTurgidson:

I've spent the last year working for a seed-stage VC firm.

VC is all about exposing weakness. Most of the time, these firms are composed of people who've developed an app or service that's going to "revolutionize" or "compliment" some segment of an industry. Analysis of their management team's competencies (does anyone on their executive team have any experience in finance/strategy/mgmt experience?) and doing extensive diligence into the "pro-forma" statements they've developed internally, market share potential, etc.. is key. Much of the value lies in securing profits associated with patents they've developed or are in the process of developing.

Most of these guys have no clue how to properly model a pro-forma income statement, let alone forecast an industry segment's growth potential and market opportunity. Take nothing they give you at face value.

The funding process is very rudimentary and valuations are typically based on EBITDA and/or Revenue multiples of precedent transaction of firms in similar spheres. Access to CapIQ was essential for me.

Bottom line: determine how this firm plans to make money and whether it's realistic given their management team's background (along with that of your general/limited partners). You really need an entrepreneurial mindset and an innate business acumen to do well in VC.

vat

 
Best Response

Here's my two cents even though I'm only an intern at a VC fund. I would study up on the notable portfolio companies, the partners, and major trends in technology. Ditto on having investment ideas or themes ready.

In my humble opinion, a VC is looking for:

  • Interpersonal skills - VC is a lot about selling capital. I feel this extends beyond just a sourcing role and truly is the number one skill. Your "Why you want to work at this VC fund?" answer should be strong enough to convince an entrepreneur why he/she should take this VC fund's money.

  • Critical thinking / "intellectual horsepower" - Very important in building a strong investment thesis. Keep in mind of Porter's Five Forces when analyzing an industry. Generally, I feel they're looking for the type of analysis you might find in a McKinsey Quarterly article (e.g. "I see three hurdles to the widespread adoption of cellulosic ethanol: one, ...."

  • An acquaintance with major trends in VC - you should know what is cloud computing, virtualization, enterprise software, SaaS, etc. I like reading up on www.techreview.com for this. Also be aware that VCs do a lot of growth equity deals which don't relate to technology at all. For example, Sequoia Capital is invested in American Dairy, Inc which sells powdered milk in China.

  • Interest in entrepreneurship - have some examples ready where you thought about entrepreneurship or thought about how you'd run a business

  • Tenacity - follow up with Thank you e-mails and be persistent. It's a highly transferable skill to the job.

Here is a good blog post on in it by an associate at Bessemer Venture Partners http://www.adventurista.com/2008/04/vc-pre-mba-hiring.html

Good luck! I'm sure you'll do well given your background in consulting and corporate strategy

 

Eaque veniam quos cupiditate excepturi. Sed quia commodi fugit quidem dolores. Officia id ipsa autem nulla sapiente labore.

Dolore dicta consequatur animi sed voluptatem dolor accusantium. Voluptatibus assumenda ut dolorem quidem laboriosam alias nesciunt. Quo nihil harum voluptatem esse sed nemo. Dolorum laudantium odio quae. Natus velit facere velit explicabo rem nostrum rerum. Ipsa et omnis qui reiciendis eos.

Ipsam nostrum eveniet omnis itaque aliquam dignissimos at quas. Consequuntur earum recusandae sapiente qui ut et dolor. Minus voluptatibus eius alias nihil qui. Culpa distinctio et eos nulla consequatur. Quam error veritatis atque ut ullam.

Sit dolorem ducimus sapiente quam. Ex molestiae est voluptate et. Repudiandae vel quisquam magnam alias quos dolorum aliquid quisquam.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”