Ned Davis Research Interview Questions

2 total interview insight submissions
Interview Experience (45%)

The Interview Experience is a score from 1 star (very negative) to 5 stars (very positive) generated based on the Interview Insights at this company.

The number you see in the middle of the doughnut pie chart is the simple average of these scores. If you hover over the various sections of the donut, you will see the % breakdown of each score given.

The percentile score in the title is calculated across the entire Company Database and uses an adjusted score based on Bayesian Estimates (to account for companies that have few interview insights). Simply put, as a company gets more reviews, the confidence of a "true score" increases so it is pulled closer to its simple average and away from the average of the entire dataset.

3.5
  • Very Negative
  • Negative
  • Neutral
  • Positive
  • Very Positive
Interview Difficulty (63%)

The Interview Difficulty is a score ranging from very difficult (red) to very easy (green) generated based on the Interview Insights at this company.

The number you see in the middle of the doughnut pie chart is the simple average of these scores. The higher the number, the more difficult the interviews on average. If you hover over the various sections of the doughnut, you will see the % breakdown of each score given.

The percentile score in the title is calculated across the entire Company Database and uses an adjusted score based on Bayesian Estimates (to account for companies that have few interview insights). Simply put, as a company gets more insights, the confidence of a "true score" increases so it is pulled closer to its simple average and away from the average of the entire data set.

3
  • Very Easy
  • Easy
  • Average
  • Difficult
  • Very Difficult

Interviews at Ned Davis Research

Filter by:
Year
Job Title
Group/Division
Location
Experience
Difficulty
1st Year Associate
Year 2014
Job Title 1st Year Associate
Group/Division Sales
Location Atlanta
Experience
Neutral
Difficulty
Average
Research Analyst
Year 2013
Job Title Research Analyst
Group/Division Equity Research
Location Los Angeles
Experience
Positive
Difficulty
Average

Interview Questions & Answers - Ned Davis Research Examples

Associate, Institutional Sales Interview - Sales

Anonymous employee in Atlanta
Interviewed: 2014
Outcome
Accepted Offer
Interview Source
Applied Online
Length of Process
1-2 months
Application
Phone Interview
1 on 1 Interview
Personality Test
Background Check
Interview
The interview process began with a phone screen. The phone screen was with HR to check out your background and make sure it made sense to continue with the process. The second interview was on the phone with the direct boss for the position. It was a fairly quick call to understand how your background relates to the sales process and understanding of the markets relating to the sale of the research. It was also the first opportunity to ask about the position and the firm. This was followed by two in person interviews in the office (basically to meet the entire office which is a small branch) and see if the cultural fit is there and basically pass the eye test of the other sales directors. The final interview was on the phone with the global head of sales just as a formality.
Interview Questions
Mainly sales questions - What are the primary factors that will contribute to your success in selling our research to prospective clients?

Research Analyst Interview - Equity Research

Anonymous interview candidate in Los Angeles
Interviewed: October 2013
Outcome
No Offer
Interview Source
Applied Online
Length of Process
6-9 months
Application
Phone Interview
1 on 1 Interview
Group Interview
Skills Test
Interview
Spring 2013 - Applied by email
August 2013 - Contacted by email for first phone interview - 1 on 1. Primarily focused on basic market concepts (relative strength, implied v. realized volatility, etc.) After this, they arranged for me to take The Language-Free Programmer/Analyst Aptitude Test (LPAT) at local university
September 2013 - Second phone interview with 4 people
October 2013 - In person interview: Flew to Venice the night before. Night before interview, went to dinner with department head, 2 other senior people in department.
Day of interview: Multiple sessions
Interview with HR: Nothing extraordinary; the HR manager picked me up from the hotel, and we mostly discussed my education
Panel Test: 45 minutes to review questions and prepare answers; questions included fundamental analysis, technical analysis (chart reading), macroeconomic analysis, and a couple brain teasers thrown in for fun
Panel Review: 90 minute group interview going over the answers to the questions
After this was several one-on-one interviews with various staff members; focused on cultural fit more than technical stuff.

Overall Impressions:
This seemed like a company with a relaxed culture (i.e., I was the only person I saw in a tie, much less a suit), but they definitely gave an impression of seriousness about their work. The staff seemed friendly to each other and to me, and my time there was planned and used well. It definitely had a small-town vibe, but this did not seem oppressive. About the only reservation I would have had about working there was the location; I have no great desire to live in Southwest Florida, but if you want to work somewhere doing serious work without all the drawbacks of a big city, this seems like a great place to work.
Interview Questions
From the panel test: suppose you have 50 white marbles and 50 blue marbles and two jars. How would you divide the marbles between the two jars to maximize the probability of selecting a blue marble after following the following procedure: First, select a jar at random. Second, select a marble at random from the jar you have selected.

Response: A blue marble in Jar 1, and the remaining marbles in Jar 2 ensures choosing a blue marble with 74.7% probability.