Most Helpful

For my group very dependent on when you enter the team. I'm one of only a few people who have started out of undergrad in recent years but for anyone the progression would be to stay in corporate strategy a few years and enter into the business as a product head, business unit strategist, or more of a niche role depending on interest and background. Comp is similar to consulting in out group so probably 80-90k all-in after undergrad, 150-200k in the few years post-MBA, and maybe 300-400k for someone who has 10-15 years of experience.

For someone like me who's more junior, the typical path is b-school or usually to a whole new industry. My past colleagues in my spot have gone into consulting, growth strategy in other industries or start-ups, and even in one case asset management (entry-level role).

There's not a ton of difference in comp for high vs. low performers which has been one of my biggest frustrations. For someone my level a top performer might get 25k bonus and a lower one might get 20k. At the more senior level it might look more like 100k vs. 80k but still not anything like IB/PE. However, you see the benefit in getting promoted faster still--a top performer might make MD-level by 30 but a lower one not until 35 or possibly not ever.

I'm sure it's slightly different across industries and more relevantly across individual firms but that's been my (admittedly narrow) experience.

 

Essentially an associate, yes (though we use different titles) with potential to VP-level promotion in the next year. My goals are less typical as I probably want to pivot industries post-MBA to something like IB or hopefully AM/PE longer-term in some capacity. Most people in my role who are post-MBA or closer to MD level are typically interested in being CEO of a business longer term or at least a key P&L owner.

Strategy has helped me evaluate markets and businesses and frame problems like a consultant would. It's also given me broad understanding and expertise of my firm's industry and many adjacent industries. More than anything, it's gotten me comfortable advising and being around senior executives/the C-suite day to day and really speak their language, understanding their biggest challenges.

 

I work in corp dev...even though I always found something appealing about strategy I could never quite picture what the day to day would like like.

Would be very useful if you could give an example of three recent projects you worked on, your role and what the day to day entailed.

Also salary for somebody at senior manager level would be useful.

 

This answer will differ a ton across firms and levels but for me I'd bucket the projects into 3 groups:

  1. Broad strategic engagements with one business unit to shape their near term strategy including growth recommendations (organic and inorganic), productivity improvements, etc.
  2. More tactical projects for a business (e.g., a key competitor had a major acquisition and they need to decide how to respond/ramifications)
  3. True corporate-level strategic work typically for the board of directors--what has our performance been, how do we bridge the gap to where we need to be performing, what are our key initiatives as a firm and where should we be going in the next 3-5 years

My last three projects were two of the first variety and one of the third, each for 3-6 months. I'm usually working alongside a small team of 2-3 teammates, business unit heads, corporate finance, and sometimes external consultants/bankers to conduct market analysis, internal projections/financials, and make decks for managements. There are also tons of side things that pop up like the CFO asks for an analysis to be done, or a major client has come up to bid and the business wants strategy's perspective and approach.

Day to day is overall a mix of being in excel, ppt, and meetings. Honestly the %s vary a ton but some projects are 50/50 ppt/meetings, some are 70/20/10 excel/ppt/meetings, it just varies.

Comp for someone at a senior manager level would probably be 300k all in or so (maybe 200-220 base, 80-100 bonus).

 
  1. Hours are very reasonable which is one of the most fortunate parts. Average day is 8:00-6:30 with occasionally some work on weekends and infrequent days staying til 8 or 9pm (a couple times a year until 11 or midnight when there's a big deadline)
  2. Zero travel for me and maybe 1-2 times/year for mid-level folks, ~5-10 for the head of the group. We have many locations globally but most meetings are via phone or VC. It's one of the major reasons most of my group decided to switch from consulting.
  3. The team is ~10 people with a very middle-heavy structure. Almost everyone is a senior associate/VP level with 3 MDs, 6-7 at around a VP level, and me as the most junior resource. Most projects have an MD and 2-3 other people, usually 1 more senior VP and 1-2 of the most junior team members. The head of the group oversees all projects with check-ins 1-2 times per week.
  4. Project staffing is conducted by the head of the group with the MDs for a (typically) weekly staff meeting to assess capacity. Most of the time projects come out of major board/firm leadership meetings and trickle down to us, and may be staffed immediately by our group's head or at the staff meetings.

Hopefully this is helpful, happy to go into more detail on any aspect

 

I also started corp development directly out of undergrand (1.5 yrs of experience here). I'm not at a F500, but at an acquisitive private company

There's not many with our background and I'm just starting now to think about my next steps as I would also like to end up in PE. I could try to pivot into IB in my industry's coverage group and then make the move. Or try to go to Bschool->IB->PE as you mentioned

What has your experience been like when looking for other opportunities and coming from a non-traditional background? Do you see going into IB/Bschool first as a prerequisite to PE or VC? Also which types of Bschools would you be targeting?

 

Appreciate that we're both in a unique position. The recruiting game has been one of my greatest struggles professionally for many reasons.

For background, I didn't even consider another role until ~1.5 years in, and as I started to look around particularly at my friends who went IB>PE and some MBB>PE (knew many from both of these from undergrad), I did more due diligence on career paths. As I read up tons on PE, I realized it was my dream role and wanted to improve my chances there.

Unfortunately I also realized PE without IB or MBB is all but impossible, so I considered ways to get there. I interviewed around years 2-3.5 at a mix of 3 types of roles: 1. Investment banks, about 3 of which were top EB (think EVR, LAZ, Moelis, PJT) and a few very small 30-100 person firms. Got offers from the latter set by virtue of my resume/background (but no path from them to PE) but the EBs always went hard on technicals or I realized the groups didn't actually interest me as much as I thought (i.e., they were more support groups without a path to the buyside) 2. Investing roles in PE FoF, secondaries, and family offices. Got 3-4 offers from these places but saw no path to direct PE investing and comp was only a hair better than my current role but in NY with way higher CoL. Also saw they were worse feeders to top b-schools 3. Strategy roles at UMM PE shops. These roles were all top comp (close to PE associate level) and interesting work but no direct path to an investing role. I considered this role>MBA>PE investing could happen but very unlikely. I got an unbelievable offer recently to join a top UMM/MF in this role but turned it down to start the b-school process and hope for the best

Short answer--no, this role has not helped me towards PE. Ironically being at an LEK/ATK/OW would probably give me a better path to PE even though I genuinely feel my role is more challenging, difficult to secure, and applicable to PE. Recruiters and PE shops don't quite understand the role or how to rank it vs. more common roles.

I targeted M-7 b-schools and a couple 8-15. Got into 2 M-7 programs and will be attending one next year. Admitted to all the programs 8-15 I applied to with scholarship but I still don't see a direct path to PE unfortunately In hindsight I probably would have pushed hard around 2 years in to get a MM/EB IB role and then go into MM PE, or lateral to BB and go UMM PE. It would have taken until 5 years experience and I would've been 2-3 years behind peers, but the path to PE has all but closed at this point no matter how hard I push or learn about the field

 

Assume you mean at the PE shops and not corp strategy? If so it was mostly behavioral/asking about my job:

  • Describing my "story" (e.g., walk me through your resume)
  • Type of projects I've worked on in corp strategy and my role
  • How I've contributed on teams typically
  • Ideas for types of projects I might be able to contribute on at the PE firm
  • Very light testing of my understanding of how a PE shop operates
  • Questioning why I'm interested in the PE industry but not trying more for an investing role (which was tough because clearly I wanted the investing role but had to develop a reason)

Overall very few if any technical questions. In fact at one firm I had 4 one-hour interviews and two of them were the CEO/founder and CFO explaining to me for 30-40 minutes their vision for the firm and where my role would fit in, and 20-30 minutes of getting my reaction to that information/explaining why I would be interested given that detail.

 

Personally, what are you favorite parts about the job and what are your pet peeves. What's the shit that make you consider leaving the job and whats is it that makes you want to stay?

 

Favorites:

  • Getting to work on the highest profile projects in the firm that often are industry-shaping. Often very exciting

  • Typically working with very senior executives directly at a very young age, and they're genuinely trusting of my opinion

  • The hours and lack of travel--so much better than IB/consulting

Disadvantages:

*Gets a little monotonous working with one "client" for every project compared to IB/consulting

  • Not a real long-term career path so transition is less clear

  • External firms don't really understand exactly what I do; if I were to work in consulting the exit opps would be way clearer and more opps would come my way for doing mostly the same work

  • Very little on the job training relative to a formal analyst program because I'm the most junior team member by far

  • People throughout the firm sometimes put menial tasks on us because we're not hourly hires like a consulting firm, so work that isn't true "strategy" work is placed on us when it's not the most efficient use of our group (but this doesn't happen extremely often)

 

Hi Wabo, did you have any prior MBB experience and would you reckon a prior MBB experience as absolutely necessary and does anyone in your team / the industry you know of, does not originate from an MBB.

Is truly everything in the world doable as long as you want it hard enough or perhaps an MBB experience definitely necessary?

What are the deal-breakers or key learning take aways needed for such roles? Key skills required for such roles?

 

I was straight out of undergrad without MBB experience (I think I noted it but lost in the many posts earlier). I don't think it's absolutely necessary but certainly helps a ton. My team over time has had ~50% ex-MBB, 30-40% ex-tier 2 firms (Deloitte, OW, Strategy&), and 10-20% other experience (usually strategy types of roles within our industry or firm for several years, including one person who has a PhD and then went into a strategy role in a totally different industry for a few years).

The roles generally teach strategic framing, PowerPoint building, executive presence/presentation, and analytical skills. Certainly possible to gain without MBB but even MBB experience in another sector is probably viewed as equal to deep strategic knowledge through analytical roles in your target sector for 5+ years. Differs by firm of course but that's my generalized perception.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Lazard Freres No 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 18 98.3%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 04 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (20) $385
  • Associates (90) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (67) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”