Arm’s Length Transaction
A principle in the exchange of businesses/trades indicating that both the buyer and the seller will execute the transaction adhering to their self-interests.
What is an Arm’s Length Transaction?
Arm’s length is a principle in the exchange of businesses/trades indicating that both the buyer and the seller will execute the transaction adhering to their self-interests. This means both parties are independent and free from any pressure or coercion.
This principle is mainly used in transfer pricing to determine a fair market value for the transfer of goods and services between the departments of the same organization.
When we say the transaction was executed ’at arm’s length,’ it may mean that the transaction between the departments (of the same entity) reflects the conditions, costs, and sales revenues set between unrelated entities.
As per the definition provided by the Organization for Economic Co-operating and Development (OECD):
“This valuation principle is commonly applied to commercial and financial transactions between related companies. It says that transactions should be valued as if they had been carried out between unrelated parties, each acting in his best interest.”
An agreement between buyers and sellers at arm’s length means neither party may influence the other. According to such negotiations, each party acts in its best interests and is not affected by the other.
They also reassure others that the buyer and seller are not conspiring. Both sides often have equal access to information about the trade out of fairness. Essentially, two companies owned by the same person conduct a transaction with one another.
We then determine an arm’s length principle to decide how much the goods or services being transacted should cost; this is called a “Fair Market Value.”
Fair Market Value is derived after an extensive process called transfer pricing. This is achieved via various methods, notably the CUP Method, Resale-Minus, and Transactional Net Margin.
A quoted definition of Fair Market Value is “The fair market value of the property is the price at which it would change hands between a willing and informed buyer and seller.”
Understanding Arm's Length Transactions
A non-arm’s length transaction is where the buyer and seller have a relationship.
For example, sales between family members and businesses with connected shareholders don’t occur at arm’s length. Instead, their business dealings are not at arm’s length. Not at arm’s length can mean they give it to them at vastly discounted rates, thereby shifting resources unethically and potentially unlawfully.
For example, having a strong relationship with a business partner and selling him goods or services at a vastly undercut price to help shift produce. The conditions of a non-length arm’s transaction frequently depend on an existing connection.
Although not prohibited, a non-length arm’s transaction will be given more attention because there is a higher likelihood of fraud.
As a result, mortgage lenders favor financing transactions that are conducted at a distance. Additionally, there is a greater likelihood that the purchase price does not represent fair market value. As a result, related parties must conduct real estate transactions at arm’s length transaction pricing.
An arm’s length transaction often guarantees that the property will be sold at a price that is as close to its fair market value as is practical, assuming that both parties have equal knowledge about the subject property.
Consider this: the seller will want to sell the property for the maximum price feasible, while the buyer will be interested in making a bargain and purchasing the house for less.
For instance, it’s doubtful that a contract between two strangers or an uncle and his nephew would end in the same outcome since the uncle would decide to offer his relative a discount. This can lead to the uncle offsetting his amount of taxable income. Thereby evading taxes unlawfully.
This kind of commercial contract, commonly referred to as an arms-length transaction, has buyers and sellers who share a common interest. The buyers and sellers already have a personal or business-related relationship.
Like this, arm’s length prices must be used for international transactions between businesses that are not on an equal footing, such as two subsidiaries of the same parent corporation. Transfer pricing, a practice, ensures that each state collects the correct taxes on the transactions.
Arm's Length Transactions and Fair Market Value (FMV)
Fair market value (FMV) is the amount a product would sell for on the open market if both the buyer and the seller acted in their best interests, were not subjected to excessive pressure, and were allowed a reasonable amount of time to complete the transaction.
It speaks to characteristics of a perfect market where both parties have access to information with product transparency, and neither party has excess influence in the market.
Given these circumstances, the fair market value of an item ought to be a reliable estimation of its value. The real estate market, bankruptcy, and tax law all recognize this phrase’s definition. One of the critical advantages of transactions conducted at arm’s length is that they are fair and equitable.
Arm’s length transactions are commonly used in various deals ranging from transferring inventory to hourly wages. A simple example would be Company A, based in the USA, and Company B, based in Puerto Rico - Both owned by the same stakeholders.
We then determine an arm’s length principle to decide how much the goods or services being transacted should cost; this is called a “Fair Market Value.” This is a fair price at which the good or service may be transacted.
Company A wants to use labor from Company B - We have to determine a Fair Market Value for the hourly rate those workers will be paid. - They are not limited to a single market niche. The main use of the arm’s length principle is in Transfer Pricing.
What is Transfer Pricing?
The technique is used to set prices for the exchange of products and services, known as intermediary goods, between the same departments or segments of the same organization. The price set is called the Transfer Price.
The transfer pricing technique is used by corporates in alignment with the arm’s length principle to promote independent and motivated managers who work without bias and deal with each other as if they are external clients to fulfill the organizational goals and strategy.
Those who are ultimately under the management of a single-parent corporation are considered entities under common control. Transfer pricing is a technique used by multinational firms to divide profits (earnings before interest and taxes) across their numerous subsidiaries.
The transfer pricing can be set through the Market Price, Negotiation Price, and Cost Models.
The market price model sets the price based on the ongoing market prices for the intermediary goods and services. In the negotiated price model, the selling price is set through a dialogue between the buying and selling units involved.
The cost models can be further classified into variable and fixed costs.
Calculating Arm’s Length Principle and Fair Market Value
Several methods are included in calculating Fair Market Value. They are notably Comparable, uncontrolled price (“CUP”), Cost Plus, Resale-Minus, Transactional Net Margin, and Profit Split.
Depending on the characteristics of the transaction depend on which method we choose. Understanding the controlled transaction (either inbound or outward) is the first step in selecting a technique.
In particular, based on the United Nations Practical Manual on Transfer Pricing, functional analysis is required regardless of the transfer pricing method chosen.
Functional analysis plays a significant role in deciding on the transfer pricing approach since it:
- To identify and understand the intra‐group transactions;
- To identify the characteristics that would make a particular transaction or function suitable for use as a comparable;
- To determine any necessary adjustments to the comparables;
- To check the relative reliability of the method selected; and
- Over time, to determine if modification of the method is appropriate because the transaction, function, allocation of risks, or allocation of assets have been modified.
Comparable Uncontrolled Price
The comparable uncontrolled price (CUP) technique determines a price based on the pricing of comparable third-party transactions that have already occurred. This dependable transfer pricing technique is one of the hardest to argue against when similar uncontrolled rates are in place.
The difficulty in locating comparable transactions is a problem for this pricing strategy. The CUP technique cannot produce correct pricing based on the existing data without adding even a few minor factors, which can distinguish the situations enough.
Despite this, the CUP method is the most direct way to calculate a fair market price. Moreover, this method is ideal if you have comparable companies available.
Adjustments can be made to eliminate material product differences. In addition, comparable Company analysis can be undertaken by using large databases like CapitalIQ or Bloomberg.
Several things must be considered for your search, including product characteristics, the extent of services, the volume of sales, and product differentiation, to name a few.
Cost Plus
Organizations can determine prices using the cost-plus transfer pricing approach by figuring out the standard cost of supplying the relevant commodities and then adding a standard profit margin when there is no market price to use as a foundation for pricing.
The transfer price for the transaction may then be determined using the total of these figures. Cost-plus pricing is a method of determining a product’s selling price by increasing the unit cost of the product by a predetermined set percentage (referred to as a “markup”).
In essence, the markup % is a strategy for achieving a targeted return rate.
Cost-plus pricing has frequently been applied to government contracts (also known as cost-plus contracts). Still, it has come under fire for decreasing suppliers’ incentives to manage direct, indirect, and fixed costs, whether or not they are connected to creating and selling goods or services.
Resale-Minus
Pricing for a product or asset sold to a third party is based on the resale price under the resale-minus approach. But the gross margin and other purchase-related expenses are deducted from that resale price to make it more accurate.
For example, when you acquire your apples from a connected party but sell your apples to third parties, you can utilize the resale minus approach.
If the input price is comparable to what a third party would pay, that is what we want to know. To arrive at the input price, we start with the sales price of the apples and deduct a profit margin per apple.
For example, an independent vendor of comparable apples should charge a 5% profit margin per apple. We may deduct this amount from our sales price to arrive at an arm’s length pricing for our input.
The resulting amount can be used as an arm’s-length price once these expenses are subtracted from the selling price.
Transactional Net-Margin
Businesses can develop transfer pricing using margin levels without real transaction data. The transactional net margin method (TNMM) establishes a net profit that may be used when setting transfer pricing for comparable, uncontrolled transactions using the net profits from another regulated transaction.
This transfer pricing approach provides more freedom in selecting transactions to coYou must calculate the net profit of a controlled transaction of a linked firm using the TNMM (tested party).
The net profit from equivalent uncontrolled transactions of independent businesses is then contrasted with this.
In contrast to other transfer pricing techniques, the TNMM demands that transactions be “broadly similar” to be considered comparable. In this instance, “broadly comparable” suggests that the compared transactions need not be an identical replica of the regulated transaction.
This broadens the range of circumstances in which the TNMM may be applied. And they can be compared to one another because real transactions aren’t used.
Profit Split Method
When two parties are involved in creating a good or other business in ways that make it challenging to investigate each party on its own, the profit split approach is applied.
Instead, the profit split approach divides equitable earnings to organizations based on a product or enterprise’s profitability or projected profitability.
Because this pricing strategy relies on margin levels and the precision of its profit distribution may be in question, it has drawbacks. However, in the absence of more precise information, or a clear separation of duties between companies, this transfer pricing approach can aid parties in reaching a reasonable agreement.
If a transaction occurs between two connected businesses, both companies may experience specific gains or losses.
The overall operational profit received by the parties to the transaction is first determined using the profit split method of transfer pricing. Then, it is divided between the parties according to their contributions.
By considering each company’s unique contribution to the overall profit or loss, Profit Split Method determines whether the profits or losses allotted to a specific business from the aggregate operational profit of a regulated transaction are at arm’s length.
Step-by-Step Guide to a Transfer Pricing Transaction to arrive at Fair Market Value
When compiling a Transfer Pricing report, we must follow certain steps to arrive at our end product for the client. This is a typical blueprint we follow in consulting to arrive at the end product.
- We peruse documents given to us by the client. This includes financials, cap tables, funding rounds, and any general notes taken at meetings.
- Determine ownership structure, intercompany transactions, and functional analysis.
- We use comparable company analysis (CCA). In addition, we can use Bloomberg or CapitalIQ and construct a search with pre-designated parameters to find relevant companies and extract our metrics.
- We formulate a results tab and extract the relevant data. (Eg, Net Cost Plus over time)
- We fill out selected companies’ financial data, including but not limited to Balance Sheets, Income Statements, and Net Cost Plus metrics.
- We fill out the selected company’s descriptions for the client to give a detailed overview of the comparables used to arrive at the end figure.
- These are all filed into a report which details the methodology and results of the sections we covered.
In conclusion, The Arm’s Length Principle aids the management in setting the price for intra-company transactions through the FMV in transfer pricing. This technique sets a fair price for buyers and sellers with no personal bias or pressure.
Ultimately, the consideration of the Arm’s Length Principle for transactions is to encourage the business units to ensure fair and ethical transactions.
or Want to Sign up with your social account?