Credit Suisse IBD Groups

I tried looking up info on the IBD groups at Credit Suisse. Unfortunately, I didn't find much on prior threads. I was hoping some of you can go through the best and worst groups at the bank in terms of deal flow and culture. Thanks in advance.

134 Comments
 

Traditionally, CS Sponsors has been spoken of in the same breath as such top-flight groups as GS TMT, MS M&A, UBS LA, etc. in terms of deals and analyst placement. However, in this current market environment, that could be rapidly changing.

Their Tech group is also very good. Some might say their Energy group is also good, but their are too many other Energy groups (LEH, GS, etc.)on the Street that are way better for them to be considered as good as their Sponsors or Tech groups.

 

CS Energy is a mediocre group. Certainly not a bad group by any means, but not a great Energy group like Lehman (widely considered the top Energy group on the street). In terms of CS, the top 3 groups there are Sponsors, Tech, and M&A, probably in that order. Media & Telecom is also decent from what I've heard.

 

I know a few people there, some who started there and some who lateraled in. They've done some of the more high-profile deals of the past few years, including Sungard's take-private back in 2005 which was at the time the biggest tech LBO at $10B or so.

In general I think CS is strong across the board... not like some banks that depend pretty heavily on leveraged finance (or should I say, depended pretty heavily) to win deals or anything, they stand up pretty well on their own.

 

Love the M&A guys. Great people. But you will get slaughtered with hours.

"They are all former investment bankers that were laid off in the economic collapse that Nancy Pelosi caused. They have no marketable skills, but by God they work hard."
 

Yeah I'm ready to put in long hours but I did read in some old threads that m&a was exceptionally brutal which is making me a little weary of that group. You know how the hours or people compare to those in industrials or financial sponsors?

 

NY HC group doesn't do too much in reality - all the deal flow you've seen is done out the SF office, which is headed by the MD that runs biotech and is the co-head of Americas Healthcare. Also m&a isn't run in house by the HC group, all passed on to the NY M&A group.

The NY TMT group does do at least some tech deals - I know the NY group specifically advised on Alibaba's investment in Fanatics.com and David Wah does spend a good amount of time in NY.

 

Agree with the above.

TMT in general is a pretty fratty group, if that matters to you at all. They work hard (though by no means are they a true "sweatshop" group), and they have decent deals (or at least they did as of this time last year).

dollas
 

Sponsors has traditionally been a strong group there and could be a good fit if you want to do credit after... M&A is pretty solid too (its not MS M&A, but let's face it, not everyone can be #1), can't really comment on TMT

 

I'd like to know about CS M&A vs JPM M&A, as well...because CS keeps telling me their teams are "lean" and I will get "better experience," but I thought on the whole JPM M&A had a better reputation. And what are the exit opps for CS M&A vs JPM M&A? Decent placements for both?

 

I do know their M&A team is pretty lean ... I was talking to an alum and he said he completed 5 deals before he finished his second year ... they underhired in '08 and only ran 5 analysts in the group and then M&A picked up and they were understaffed.

 

Agree with above, but depends on office. Technology is great in SF/Palo Alto, but the leadership out of NY and culture sucks. I'd throw in Energy also. They're great group, but long hours. The M&A groups is picking up and has done great this year advising on many large deals and LBOs. The Media & Telecom group is great with good group of people and lots of deal flow. It depends on what you like. Same can be said for Industrials. CS also has great regional offcies. Its office in SF, Chicago, and LA are considered to be in top 3 for the respective city.

M&A has the worst hours. Trust me as I know someone who's an associate in that group, but you're getting probably the best experience, so it's your call.

 
Bruce WayneCliche answer - just apply everywhere. Key thing is to get an offer first and then worry about location afterwards...

I understand that, however ive been asked by bankers before whether i want to do west coast vs east coast banking. And ive been told by people who went through recruiting last year that in their first rounds they were asked for a preference.

 

I believe that CS Chicago covers Industrials, Services, FIG and Consumer. Does some Latin America and Asia deals. Very strong office from what I hear.

 

I'd go with Healthcare - pretty familiar with the group and know that they have very strong dealflow (specifically in M&A) and place well in PE as well. The top guys there are make it rain; one senior banker there is a douchebag though - hopefully you won't be working with him

 

i'd be interested in responses as well, mostly because i would like to know how much restructuring work the bb's will actually have over the summer (as opposed to the smaller boutiques that are more focused in this area...)

 
wonderi'd be interested in responses as well, mostly because i would like to know how much restructuring work the bb's will actually have over the summer (as opposed to the smaller boutiques that are more focused in this area...)

I'm curious about this to. I'm not quite sure about what BB's actually do during the restructuring process, since boutiques are the lead advisers.

 

LFO&R was formed 2 or 3 years ago when CS merged their Lev Fin and Restructuring groups. very good group because in both good times and bad, you'll have work to do. also, i've heard the culture is very good.

 

I've heard good things about tech, especially in SF; although now that Quattrone is back in the game, that might not be quite as accurate.

 

Healthcare is pretty mediocre. Traditionally, the best groups have been sponsors (them and JPM are top 2), M&A, energy (best on the street), and tech (top 3, notch below GS/MS, well above all else).

FIG and Healthcare are both pretty weak. Industrials is solid, just got split up into two smaller subcategories though.

 

I've heard that in London their lev fin used to very strong in terms of compensation.

Just my 2c.

__________ Just my 2c.
 

Energy & power group (NYC) is much better than oil & gas (Houston). Really, really good alternative energy group too between the tech group and energy & power group, probably 2nd only to MS, if that.

 

You're right that FS is the most difficult group to get into. Everyone wants to get in that group since they're the top on the street. Lev Fin works closely with Sponsors and is quite strong. They do most of the execution I'd say. The hours are also bit better than Sponsors on average.

The people in M&A are pretty cool and diverse, but hard working group. That's the case at any BB M&A group though. If you're willing to put the hours, it's a great group. I'd stay away from Technology in NY. The heavy hitting MDs are all in SF. I don't know much about Media. The energy group is strong in NYC also if you're into that.

 

Scott

Thanks. I appreciate the feedback.

From what I have heard the Sponsors group at CS mostly works with the BIG sponsors, does most of the financial analysis and the Lev Fin group works on execution (syndication, debt structuring etc.). Also, I have heard that the Lev Fin group also works directly on SOME LBO deals with some mid-market companies. Is that accurate?

How about the exit opportunities? Would you say that Lev Fin has similar exit opportunities at PE/HF/VC firms? If not what are the exit opportunities after working in Lev Fin at CS? Also, how many people work in the Lev Fin group and how many people do they take each year from the Associate class?

 

Lev Fin at CS actually doesn't really touch Sponsors deals, they just do capital raising for companies. All the LevFin work for LBOs will be done within Sponsors and DCM. LevFin is also the restructuring group at CS. The LevFin group does not really work with Sponsors all too closely, both do a significant amount of execution, though sponsors does considerably more, and Sponsors does work a good 10 extra hours a week. Hope this helps.

 

Lev Fin at CS actually doesn't really touch Sponsors deals, they just do capital raising for companies. All the LevFin work for LBOs will be done within Sponsors and DCM. LevFin is also the restructuring group at CS. The LevFin group does not really work with Sponsors all too closely, both do a significant amount of execution, though sponsors does considerably more, and Sponsors does work a good 10 extra hours a week. Hope this helps.

 

i would say if you are stuck having to work at CS, i would just kill yourself, before agonizing over which group to get stuck with.

livin large in miami
 

glee:

IB2007 has good questions regarding CS. There is no need for you to make these kind of comments.

What did you do, get rejected by CS?

 

coltsreign:

you have no sense of humor. it was a JOKE. and 2> i rejected them:_)

but sponsors is the best one there, from what ive heard from friends at the firm

livin large in miami
 

coltsreign thanks for backing me up!

I realize that Sponsors is the BEST group at CS and obviously it is going to be my #1 choice. However, I think most spots in the Sponsors group are already taken. So, I am looking for feedback on other groups that I should consider. I am leaning towards M&A, Technology (NY) or Healthcare. If somebody could provide info on deal flow/culture/hours/people in these groups that would be great.

 

has long hours, but other groups work hard also. I'd say the experience you get is definitely worth the few (5-10) extra hours per week. You'll work o the highest profile deals for the firm and have exposure to great senior MDs. I'd say Sponsors/Energy (the other top groups) work just as hard also.

 

It depends on networking. You get the opportunity to meet with plenty of people and you also have to seek out the specifics groups you want. The group members ultimately invite you back.

 

At voluptatibus quas non et. Voluptatem aut officiis sed impedit velit aliquid quae. Non voluptatem cupiditate labore.

Voluptatibus nihil expedita in quas minus dignissimos deserunt. Et minima impedit facere mollitia consequuntur. Velit quo asperiores consequatur ipsa.

Eum deleniti animi quis dignissimos corrupti ipsum vel reiciendis. Qui quos omnis facere expedita. Cum soluta deserunt sit excepturi blanditiis. Maiores quidem consequatur natus cumque exercitationem.

 

Autem aperiam delectus quod est enim placeat occaecati consequatur. Dolorem perspiciatis ad veritatis natus tempore et. Ea in dolores est molestiae. Est ipsum provident quae dolores consectetur voluptas. Alias quas odit officiis quia eaque voluptates nemo. Ea sit aliquid repellendus sed numquam. Blanditiis sed officiis reprehenderit nesciunt exercitationem aut aliquid.

Sunt veniam aliquam quia voluptatem qui incidunt nihil. Quia aut eveniet non quos commodi. Quod veritatis qui sed aspernatur totam.

Sed reiciendis et voluptate necessitatibus nam similique. Eaque ea non illo totam qui. Vel similique et soluta ea quidem labore.

Culpa ut et accusantium voluptatum omnis. Quia et ut tempora accusantium ducimus quidem. Et est sed dolorem ipsam quia et ipsa. Facere voluptates aut voluptas dolorum.

 

Nesciunt libero asperiores iste mollitia fuga labore qui quos. Dignissimos id libero et delectus debitis laborum harum. Qui consequuntur ipsa repudiandae repellat illum deleniti.

Autem omnis quos amet hic quia. Excepturi corporis excepturi dolor facilis quibusdam est occaecati eaque. Explicabo enim est pariatur. Perferendis architecto voluptatum iste tempore.

 

Expedita in nobis in voluptatem doloribus repellendus neque. Perferendis deleniti velit est sed earum aut nam doloremque. Eum sequi iure hic accusamus aut odio tempora consequuntur.

Magni qui accusamus rerum doloremque dolores necessitatibus. Quo sint corporis sed minima sunt nemo. Aut non adipisci excepturi est.

Corporis quibusdam dignissimos sint ipsam facere. Voluptatem sapiente vitae cum autem eos ipsa. Asperiores aut quaerat rerum nulla quia non. Blanditiis est corporis sequi ut aliquam quia aspernatur. Recusandae dolor vel nemo et sapiente et doloribus.

A nulla corrupti eum. Quis atque itaque corrupti nam et. Nobis assumenda illum reiciendis. Molestiae beatae architecto accusantium quia tenetur voluptatem aliquid commodi.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (68) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”