Box Chooses MS, CS, and JPM for Its IPO

Had enough tech IPO's yet? Well you'd better have room for one more, because here comes Box, and they're looking to raise $500 million at IPO early next year. To that end, the company has announced that they've chosen Morgan Stanley as dealrunner, with Credit Suisse and JP Morgan Chase batting cleanup as syndicate partners.

The enterprise cloud company is something of a tech darling among investors, and its last round of financing was oversubscribed by $25 million, valuing the company north of $1.2 billion. So there's no telling what the ultimate valuation will be at IPO, but somewhere on the order of $3-5 billion isn't outside the realm of possibility (if you're willing to use the Twitter IPO as a measuring stick).

Box has been hitting all the stations of the cross on its way to an IPO. Earlier this year, CEO Aaron Levie confirmed to AllThingsD that the company is on track to exceed $100 million in revenue this year. And while he also admitted that Box’s burn rate is typically in the “seven figure per month” range, Levie states that the company’s biggest expense is the sales and marketing people who can, as he put it, “get enterprise deals done.” In January, Levie predicted that Box would have 1,000 employees by the end of 2013, and I just heard from a source today who said that, as of October, it was already north of 900.

The thing that surprises me is that Box is essentially a Dropbox knockoff, and there are a ton of them these days. So where are the sky-high valuations coming from? What I mean specifically, is what is Box doing differently from everyone else in this space? At this point, cloud storage is pretty much a commodity. With minimal downtime across the board, the only arrow you have in your quiver is price - and any salesman worth his salt will tell you that you never want to compete solely on price.

Don't get me wrong: the company is making a lot of smart moves and they have revenues (remember when producing revenues used to be a thing?). But I just don't get why you would pay 20 or 30 times those revenues when the self-storage place down the street (which provides essentially the same service on a brick-and-mortar basis) would be lucky to sell for three time revenues. Let's face it: storage is storage.

So I guess it's hats off to the three banks that'll be collecting fat fees on this deal. Otherwise, I really don't get it.

 

Dropbox is literally cloud storage. You upload something, it stays in folders in the cloud. That's pretty much it.

Box's platform is much more powerful. Multiple users, more advanced sharing options, collaboration/task options, exploding share links, sorting options, etc. I would think of it as leaning more towards project management vs. storage. You pay per user as opposed to per account. So your company could have a 10TB account, but a firm with 50 users and 10TB pays more than a firm with 5 users using 10TB.

Disclaimer: my firm pays big $$$ to Box.

Currently: future neurologist, current psychotherapist Previously: investor relations (top consulting firm), M&A consulting (Big 4), M&A banking (MM)
 

Here's where I'm getting lost.

I was recently hired by a mature (20+ years old), mid-sized consulting firm to help transition the company to the cloud (email, communications, collaboration, storage, the whole 9 yards), so of course Box was part of the initial conversation. But I just couldn't find enough of a differentiation to tip the scales in their favor. So maybe I'm missing something. They call themselves enterprise, and maybe that's it: you need 10 petabytes of cloud storage for them to be the clear winner. But for a mid-size enterprise there just wasn't any difference from Dropbox, or even really Carbonite (obviously that's not really a solution, just saying), and there certainly wasn't the suite of productivity apps like Google Apps or Office 365.

 
Best Response
Edmundo Braverman:

Here's where I'm getting lost.

I was recently hired by a mature (20+ years old), mid-sized consulting firm to help transition the company to the cloud (email, communications, collaboration, storage, the whole 9 yards), so of course Box was part of the initial conversation. But I just couldn't find enough of a differentiation to tip the scales in their favor. So maybe I'm missing something. They call themselves enterprise, and maybe that's it: you need 10 petabytes of cloud storage for them to be the clear winner. But for a mid-size enterprise there just wasn't any difference from Dropbox, or even really Carbonite (obviously that's not really a solution, just saying), and there certainly wasn't the suite of productivity apps like Google Apps or Office 365.

It depends on whether you're looking for storage or collaboration. Dropbox doesn't offer anything in terms of collaboration - you upload files and they sit there. There's no version control, no commenting system, no sharing, etc. My firm was running off two Dropbox accounts (1TB each), but since we were syncing from all 20 of our computers, we would overwrite each others' files, folders would disappear when someone accidentally deleted it from their desktop sync, etc. Dropbox is great for personal storage (I used to myself for years before I switched to Google Drive), but for a large group of people who have need for collaboration, it's horrible.

That said, Google Apps gets my vote any day. Blazing fast, super simple, liberal on the space.

Currently: future neurologist, current psychotherapist Previously: investor relations (top consulting firm), M&A consulting (Big 4), M&A banking (MM)
 
AndyLouis:

with what gdrive offers i dont know how other cloud storage companies can continue to exist much longer

This. And additional storage is stupid cheap. With Microsoft sunsetting Exchange Server 2003 next April (and don't kid yourself: thousands of companies are still on XS 2003) Google Apps is going to explode just for the Gmail interface alone.

 

Velit ipsum quia voluptas rerum. Aut ducimus qui enim facilis molestiae impedit. Error id non cum voluptas dolore sint. Sunt autem velit ipsum id similique ex. Dignissimos voluptatum natus suscipit itaque dicta. Facere aliquam laboriosam ea aperiam officia sequi.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
numi's picture
numi
98.8
10
Kenny_Powers_CFA's picture
Kenny_Powers_CFA
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”