“I found my mentoring session with André very helpful, particularly because I came into it with very little understanding of commercial banking. My background is in life sciences and healthcare, and most of my career exploration so far has focused on consulting. Although I had become interested in commercial banking, I had not previously explored the area in any depth. I therefore needed a clear starting point and an honest conversation about what I should understand before deciding whether to pursue it.
André helped me establish that starting point. The session gave me a clearer way to think about commercial banking, how it differs from consulting, and what I still need to learn. Before the conversation, I was looking at opportunities and wondering whether I should begin applying alongside consulting applications. Afterwards, I understood that I needed to take a step back and make a more informed decision about whether the work genuinely interests me.
One of the most valuable aspects of the session was how it helped me recognise the gaps in my current understanding. I knew that I was new to banking, but I did not necessarily know which questions I needed to answer for myself. André’s guidance helped me think more clearly about where I am now, what I am missing, and what I should begin doing next. Having that direction was useful because it made the process feel more manageable. Rather than treating banking as a broad and unfamiliar industry, I now have a clearer starting point for learning about it.
A particularly helpful message was that I should first develop a better understanding of commercial banking and assess whether I actually like the work. I took away a sensible sequence: understand the area, decide whether it appeals to me, and then, if it does, commit to learning and preparing for applications. If I discover that the work does not suit my interests, I should be willing to recognise that and focus my efforts elsewhere. That advice sounds straightforward, but it was an important perspective for me at this stage.
The conversation made me realise that I should not rush into applying for commercial banking roles simply because I have found programmes that look interesting. Before the session, I was at risk of moving too quickly from curiosity to applications without having a strong enough understanding of the career itself. André helped me see the value of being more deliberate. I would rather make a considered application based on a genuine interest in the work than spend time applying to positions I cannot yet explain my motivation for pursuing.
Another important takeaway was recognising how substantial the differences between banking and consulting can be. Because consulting has been my main focus, it had become my reference point when thinking about other careers. The session helped me realise that I cannot assume banking will involve similar work, suit the same preferences, or require exactly the same preparation. I need to understand banking on its own terms rather than view it mainly as another option alongside consulting.
I also appreciated that the session was useful even though I did not finish it with a final career decision. At this exploratory stage, greater clarity about what I do not yet know is meaningful progress. I now feel better equipped to evaluate my interest, identify what I need to learn, and decide whether commercial banking deserves a more focused place in my career plans.
Overall, André was very helpful, and the session met an important need for me as someone starting with limited knowledge of the field. Its greatest value was giving me direction and encouraging a more thoughtful approach to my next steps. I left with a clearer understanding of my knowledge gaps, a more realistic perspective on the difference between banking and consulting, and a better sense of how to move forward before committing to applications.”
Is this Operations consulting? If so, it's still consulting, so obviously not back-office. The day-to-day work and overall career path is similar to the other consulting tracks, but you'll be focusing on operations work.
The impression I got while recruiting for McK is that the more specialized roles were viewed as less glamorous than the generalist one, especially ops and BTO (business technology, which is essentially IT consulting). But the recruiting process is similar and it's still a very hard job to get.
Do you think B-Schools view it as less glamorous?
Maybe a little, but even so, at the end of the day, you'd still be a McKinsey consultant, which is arguably the top feeder to b-school.
And fyi, ops typically promotes their BA's directly to associate, so you don't have to get an MBA. If your goal is to make partner as fast as possible, ops is the easiest way to do it.
By goal is HBS-->PE
operations is pretty relevant for pe. do a good job, take on responsibilities, and impress your boss so you get good recommendations. i remember you have a pretty good gmat, gpa should be ok, right? it's all about how you present your story then. try doing something extraordinary by the time you apply so you have an interesting story.
Hey sorry to revive an old thread, but I was curious if anyone here is familiar with the recruiting process with McK Ops Analyst Academy? Is it the same case-study interview process that any other analyst does?
Bump.
Bump again....damn it.
Yes, same recruiting process.
phone chat with hr > phone case > 1st round > 2nd round > offer
Anyone knows salary level (by city), etc.? Looks like they look for people with 2 years of experience.
Does anyone here work at McK ops? Is it possible to eventually lateral to the strategy side?
Bump--how competitive is Ops compared to Strategy?
ops is significantly easier to get into than generalist. also significantly less prestigeous but its not like BO or anything its still consulting
Wouldn't say its easier to get into, same bar in general, but there is a bit more of a technical aspect to ops than generalist.
No difference in prestige, e.g. no dif in pay, work, etc.
Ops consultants work mostly in ops, but can get staffed into other projects if there is a strong enough push to do so.
yes, there is a large difference between doing strategy consulting and streamlining operations in terms of prestige - even if they are both at McK.
Sigh...please don't comment on stuff where you don't facts to support...
Within McK, there is no difference between Ops, generalist, other practices, etc. Career path is exactly the same. "Prestige" might be different in your mind, but no one within McKinsey or industry will see a difference.
Is pay the same even at senior levels?
Partner pay is going to be performance pay dependent, so pay is def not the same, but prob in similar bands for similar performance.
Totam ut nemo quae sed laudantium omnis voluptatem. Voluptatum ratione velit et accusamus doloremque voluptas. Et cum a qui a autem officia. Impedit id ad optio quae nemo suscipit non.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...