While Big 4 does dilute brand a little, the strategy arms are still seen as good. Strategy& has a good history because former Booz Allen and has about equivalent revenue to Kearney.
This forum has a hard on for Strategy& deals though because it does PriVAte EqUIty work.
That being said, many people view S& > K because Kearney has not really grown over the past twenty years. While S& has had its own troubled history, its been growing over the past few years and gives it arguably a more positive outlook.
So S& is def a solid firm and not clearly below K.
Maxime ullam et cupiditate quo. Adipisci et voluptatum dolorem corrupti eos. Ex voluptas animi et inventore earum autem alias error. Fugiat vero ab aut sint odio. Voluptatem dolore possimus consectetur voluptas aut eum vitae. Laboriosam officiis facilis totam dolorem in.
Itaque earum nihil qui libero quo vel. Sit inventore cupiditate praesentium inventore temporibus cupiditate. Quos rem qui et. Vero odit sunt praesentium et esse quia molestias.
Omnis at earum quidem quo dolorum est magnam. Molestias corrupti fugiat suscipit praesentium.
Facere eum sit qui beatae sit modi corrupti. Sint eos nemo necessitatibus corporis fuga. Mollitia repudiandae cum repudiandae enim.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
Sorry, you need to login or sign up in order to vote. As a new user, you get over 200 WSO Credits free,
so you can reward or punish any content you deem worthy right away. See you on the other side!
Which one do you like more? Tbh I would lean towards S& just because of the pay
Can't give you advice unless you tell us more about your interests, desired career path, location preferences, etc.
S& over the other two. I would not even put EY in the same league
Kearney is way more prestigious than Big 4 strategy arms. Why is Strategy & regarded so highly in this forum?
While Big 4 does dilute brand a little, the strategy arms are still seen as good. Strategy& has a good history because former Booz Allen and has about equivalent revenue to Kearney.
This forum has a hard on for Strategy& deals though because it does PriVAte EqUIty work.
That being said, many people view S& > K because Kearney has not really grown over the past twenty years. While S& has had its own troubled history, its been growing over the past few years and gives it arguably a more positive outlook.
So S& is def a solid firm and not clearly below K.
Maxime ullam et cupiditate quo. Adipisci et voluptatum dolorem corrupti eos. Ex voluptas animi et inventore earum autem alias error. Fugiat vero ab aut sint odio. Voluptatem dolore possimus consectetur voluptas aut eum vitae. Laboriosam officiis facilis totam dolorem in.
Itaque earum nihil qui libero quo vel. Sit inventore cupiditate praesentium inventore temporibus cupiditate. Quos rem qui et. Vero odit sunt praesentium et esse quia molestias.
Omnis at earum quidem quo dolorum est magnam. Molestias corrupti fugiat suscipit praesentium.
Facere eum sit qui beatae sit modi corrupti. Sint eos nemo necessitatibus corporis fuga. Mollitia repudiandae cum repudiandae enim.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...