Trending Content
+16 | Lateral to MBB from Investing Seat | 13 | 9m | |
+12 | Premed to MBB Recruiting | 2 | 4d | |
+11 | Chances at MBB - Reality Check | 2 | 6d | |
+9 | Seeking Advice: Applying for Consulting Roles Post-MSc—Home Country vs. Study Abroad Location | 1 | 1d | |
+3 | Am i cooked for MBB | 6 | 11h | |
+2 | On campus jobs? | 3 | 3h | |
+1 | Portfolio Operations Group--DFW area | 2 | 5d |
Career Resources
Which one do you like more? Tbh I would lean towards S& just because of the pay
Can't give you advice unless you tell us more about your interests, desired career path, location preferences, etc.
S& over the other two. I would not even put EY in the same league
Kearney is way more prestigious than Big 4 strategy arms. Why is Strategy & regarded so highly in this forum?
While Big 4 does dilute brand a little, the strategy arms are still seen as good. Strategy& has a good history because former Booz Allen and has about equivalent revenue to Kearney.
This forum has a hard on for Strategy& deals though because it does PriVAte EqUIty work.
That being said, many people view S& > K because Kearney has not really grown over the past twenty years. While S& has had its own troubled history, its been growing over the past few years and gives it arguably a more positive outlook.
So S& is def a solid firm and not clearly below K.
Natus consequatur dolor et omnis nemo eaque. Molestiae unde error blanditiis expedita qui. Deleniti temporibus ut ipsum. Maxime unde repudiandae autem quo laudantium nesciunt. Odio non deleniti assumenda excepturi qui aperiam delectus modi.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...