CFA® Level 2 Pass Rate

I just passed Level 2, and this is a post to debunk the rumor that 70% is necessary for this exam. I never got above 70 on a full practice exam (of the 8 I took, most were in the high 50's or low 60's), and I had a hard time believing the people on forums who were talking about their 75% on the practice tests. Those people aren't necessarily embellishing, but it can be done without making those insanely high (by CFA® practice test standards) scores, so don't let that discourage you. Based on my score card, I probably scored right around 64%. This year, 43% of candidates passed.

CFA® Level 2 Passing Score

As the OP highlighted, the general thought is that if you can score a 70% on practice exams and the actual level 2 exam - you will certainly pass the level 2 exam. Since there is not a posted passing threshold, 70% is a good marker to go by, however, the OP explained that a score in the mid-to-low 60% will likely result in a pass as well.

jmoney2405 The 70% is more of a "if you get this you'll definitely pass" point than an exact measurement. Based on my results I probably scored between 66-70 on the test and I passed level II. It also depends on how you do in the more heavily weighted areas, I talked to a guy who got over 70% on 5 different areas but they were all the least weighted ones and he got destroyed in the most important areas.

Learn more about how to pass the CFA® Level 2 with the below video.

Read More About the CFA® on WSO

Looking to Break into the Hedge Fund World?

Want to land at an elite hedge fund use our HF Interview Prep Course which includes 814 questions across 165 hedge funds. The WSO Hedge Fund Interview Prep Course has everything you’ll ever need to land the most coveted jobs on the buyside.

Hedge Fund Interview Course

14 Comments
 

It's not necessary, the "rumor" is if you can get a 70% you are most likely a pass. That's the threshold to aim for in order to not fail.

edit: ...and congrats on passing!

Frank Sinatra - "Alcohol may be man's worst enemy, but the bible says love your enemy."
 

I think the common wisdom is that if you score above 70%, you're basically guranteed to pass. Not that the MPS is set at 70%....

 
Best Response
slick_J

I just passed Level 2, and this is a post to debunk the rumor that 70% is necessary for this exam. I never got above 70 on a full practice exam (of the 8 I took, most were in the high 50's or low 60's), and I had a hard time believing the people on forums who were talking about their 75% on the practice tests. Those people aren't necessarily embellishing, but it can be done without making those insanely high (by CFA practice test standards) scores, so don't let that discourage you. Based on my score card, I probably scored right around 64%. This year, 43% of candidates passed.

Dude, there's no rumor that 70% is needed to pass any of the CFA exams. Like others have said, a 70% will always pass you, but the CFAI doesn't set the passing rate at that level.

 

My post should be a little clearer. I have spoken with people who are convinced that it's 70% for levels 1 and 2, but clearly that is not a majority feeling here.

The point I'm making is that the actual passing percentage is significantly lower than many might suspect. 70% is a REALLY, REALLY HIGH target score for level 2. It might be achievable at Level 1, but if you think you'll be consistently scoring above 70 by test time for level 2, when you are taking the practice tests and are getting nowhere near 70, do not be discouraged because almost no one is.

If you've never taken this exam, you may not understand that there's a MILE between 60 and 70%. I only want to pass along, that you do not have to close that gap to pass. I think (and have really compelling evidence on the scorecard in front of me) that the passing score probably lies in the lower half of that range.

 
slick_J

If you've never taken this exam, you may not understand that there's a MILE between 60 and 70%. I only want to pass along, that you do not have to close that gap to pass. I think (and have really compelling evidence on the scorecard in front of me) that the passing score probably lies in the lower half of that range.

Of course. Every problem becomes additionally more difficult to score correctly on. The marginal cost of getting each additional question right increases. The exam is exponentially more difficult. Statistically, by chance, you'll get 33%. Under that is very bad luck. 50% with a modicum of studying, 60% as you begin to work harder, 70% becomes difficult, 80% would be insanely difficult, 90% nearly impossible.

 

The 70% is more of a "if you get this you'll definitely pass" point than an exact measurement. Based on my results I probably scored between 66-70 on the test and I passed level II. It also depends on how you do in the more heavily weighted areas, I talked to a guy who got over 70% on 5 different areas but they were all the least weighted ones and he got destroyed in the most important areas.

Give me a kid whose smart, poor, and hungry...............
 

I also passed L2, feels great! Take it for what it is, but I was scoring between 62-70% on all 6 schweser mocks and the cfai mock, and progressively got worse as I reviewed them. On the actual managed to get 70+ on all sections except ethics (50-70) and alt, der, pm (50).

 
slick_JBased on my score card, I probably scored right around 64%.

1) You have no way of knowing what your score is to a single number. 2) You get a slight undisclosed bump if you are right on the edge but do well in ethics.

If you use the highest point in each range to compute your score, still get below 70%, and didn't do well in ethics, then I might believe your hypothesis.

 

Tempora libero occaecati qui cupiditate sunt consequatur ut. Pariatur suscipit quam molestias omnis qui dolorem repellat. Reiciendis distinctio cumque quia earum fuga tempore consectetur. Architecto fugit ea quo excepturi quod aspernatur.

Dolore delectus perferendis voluptatum officia nam est deserunt. Tempore sint et eos esse porro est molestiae. Et nihil cum non quam quidem nemo. Dolorem ut quo vitae ut assumenda ex iusto. Commodi et earum beatae enim ipsum. Necessitatibus distinctio dignissimos aperiam incidunt qui labore.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (15) $434
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”