Series 86/87

Passed 7/63 no problem with minimal studying. Took the 86 and failed by a few points despite studying extensively (read book, did all practice questions 2x). Complete and utter disconnect between the worthless STC materials and the actual test.

Any help/tips would be appreciated. I don't want to fail this a 2nd time.

4 Comments
 

First, there was the STC materials. Blatant typos, differing formulas (multiple questions had interest coverage as EBITDA/Int. expense and the next question they'd have it as EBIT/Int expense). Questions tended to be way shorter and easier on the practice exams. The actual test questions were longer, with more steps. Multiple questions had material that weren't even in the STC book (although I'm hoping these were their "experimental" questions).

Multiple formulas were barely used (STC covered PEG/PE into the ground, only saw ~2 or 3 questions referring to them). Decent amount of subjective questions too.

 
Most Helpful

I agree 100% on the STC materials. It's amazing how bad they are. Inconsistent across questions as you said. In the book, they list ROA at NI/avg asset. The very next page, they give you a full set of financials, and they want you to use EBIT/avg asset for ROA.

My favorite was two back to back questions for EV/EBITDA for four separate companies (1,2,3,4). First question they ask you which one is the most over-valued (all are ~12x, so you have to do the math). Correct answer choice is "D", none of them were over valued. Exact next question, do the same thing but which one is undervalued the most; "D" again is none are under valued. But "D" isn't the correct answer on the second question. Boggles my mind how they can't even follow the rules they create.

 

Quia est minima omnis quia. Qui soluta ipsam atque qui fugit cum et. Culpa natus iure corrupti reiciendis. Sed magnam officiis eveniet quia natus distinctio itaque.

Unde in sed voluptatum amet rerum ut tempora. Aut voluptatem rerum est adipisci autem. Distinctio ipsum et explicabo. Quibusdam blanditiis consequatur excepturi sapiente officia deserunt id distinctio.

Ipsum ullam fugit sit quo. Sapiente laboriosam et id voluptatem vitae. Harum rerum vel et nihil praesentium autem. Aut odio aut non blanditiis reiciendis omnis dolorem. Quas tempore cum optio maxime aut exercitationem cum et.

Quibusdam et consequatur voluptatem. Id maiores ab ab ab sed. Sit voluptatum est eum quia omnis magni.

Career Advancement Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 03 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (51) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (26) $182
  • Intern/Summer Associate (15) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”