Are high-flying hedge funds really serving their purpose if they are vastly underperforming during a bear market?

https://www.ft.com/content/87347d49-390d-408b-9059-2e5a42b5787c

Tiger announces yet another down quarter.  If you ask why hedge funds underperform S&P, you get justifications saying that it's because they are products for institutional investors and will do better during bear markets aka a "hedge."  Obviously Tiger isn't representative of all funds but it's defo contrasting the image that everyone makes about hedge funds being sophisticated products to protect a whale's portfolio during a downside. 

 

Tiger's recent performance has certainly made people change their opinions of these 'prestigious' single manager L/S funds. IMO, HFs should be more or less pure alpha vehicles (i.e., run little to no systematic risk). Beta timing works until it doesn't...

The multimanager platforms are great at doing this (actual idiosyncratic alpha) and there are others who are less in the headlines who profit handsomely in all or most market environments.

 
Most Helpful

I think Tiger is seen as "prestigious" because of the lifestyle people assume from the outside.  Nice office overlooking Central Park, seeing green in your portfolio most of the time, flying out to SF to meet founders of exciting startups, lots of media attention and everyone wants your opinion on their tech stocks (and for the past few years most of your picks have been right), etc.  However, MMs aren't great places to work but are great for investors.  To be fair, the big MMs these days actually fit the "hedge" fund definition.

 

Et illum vero similique. Et aut non eos. Quod quo alias voluptatem natus harum dolore. Aperiam velit qui vitae iure.

Qui quis quibusdam voluptas. Est atque nisi voluptates nobis dolorem molestiae officia. Culpa excepturi placeat eius magnam temporibus.

Quos voluptas sit facilis rerum. Nemo vel voluptatem ullam quis iusto. Dolores repellat natus ut veniam vel.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.9%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.8%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.8%
  • AQR Capital Management 94.7%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.8%
  • Blackstone Group 96.8%
  • Two Sigma Investments 95.7%
  • Citadel Investment Group 94.6%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 97.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 96.9%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.8%
  • Citadel Investment Group 94.8%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (23) $474
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (6) $322
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (24) $287
  • Manager (4) $282
  • Engineer/Quant (71) $274
  • 2nd Year Associate (30) $251
  • 1st Year Associate (73) $190
  • Analysts (225) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (23) $131
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (250) $85
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”