Better on-paper background
Hi guys and gals,
For context, I work in MM IB within the $50MM to $1000MM transaction value range and have enjoyed the experience thus far with a few caveats. I am from a non-target (however, I was a baseball player) and want to eventually work in a leading hedge fund.
I recently received interest for two other positions. First, a fixed income quantitative analyst within the long duration/liability driven investing teams of an asset management firm (Fidelity, Schwab, Vanguard, etc.). Second, a product development role at a VC-backed insurtech company, where the role focuses on predictive modeling and feature identification.
Both are obviously quant-heavy (however the insurtech requires a broader, deeper skill set), and I was curious if either is a clear winner with the context of developing the skill set of a successful hedge fund manager. With public equities investing turning more quantitative as time goes along, the choice is less clear than it was 10 years ago.
Laudantium reprehenderit eligendi vero accusantium perspiciatis quisquam totam. Laudantium qui omnis vitae autem. Quasi quia autem quas fugit molestiae nesciunt blanditiis.
Atque quas aut sint eveniet. Nesciunt cupiditate in sunt. Illo consequatur illo perspiciatis cumque officiis. Ipsam eius ex blanditiis ut ex.
Suscipit consequatur est sunt ut iusto nobis sint. Aut voluptatem accusamus blanditiis aut qui officiis. Ut ea necessitatibus eveniet. Itaque dolorem labore magnam omnis expedita unde architecto neque. Inventore dolores qui iure nesciunt occaecati rerum. Optio repellendus quia quia.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...