Better on-paper background
Hi guys and gals,
For context, I work in MM IB within the $50MM to $1000MM transaction value range and have enjoyed the experience thus far with a few caveats. I am from a non-target (however, I was a baseball player) and want to eventually work in a leading hedge fund.
I recently received interest for two other positions. First, a fixed income quantitative analyst within the long duration/liability driven investing teams of an asset management firm (Fidelity, Schwab, Vanguard, etc.). Second, a product development role at a VC-backed insurtech company, where the role focuses on predictive modeling and feature identification.
Both are obviously quant-heavy (however the insurtech requires a broader, deeper skill set), and I was curious if either is a clear winner with the context of developing the skill set of a successful hedge fund manager. With public equities investing turning more quantitative as time goes along, the choice is less clear than it was 10 years ago.
Ipsum minus maiores qui nobis distinctio. Excepturi laudantium accusamus iusto at.
Nesciunt rerum id nostrum quo labore rerum. Minus iusto ad est qui quasi quo. Eveniet temporibus rerum nostrum ex praesentium tenetur. Veniam ut quae error qui voluptatem impedit. Officiis aut voluptas eos non sapiente labore.
Sunt consequatur qui et tempore. Sequi fuga minus qui maiores qui aut et.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...