Better on-paper background
Hi guys and gals,
For context, I work in MM IB within the $50MM to $1000MM transaction value range and have enjoyed the experience thus far with a few caveats. I am from a non-target (however, I was a baseball player) and want to eventually work in a leading hedge fund.
I recently received interest for two other positions. First, a fixed income quantitative analyst within the long duration/liability driven investing teams of an asset management firm (Fidelity, Schwab, Vanguard, etc.). Second, a product development role at a VC-backed insurtech company, where the role focuses on predictive modeling and feature identification.
Both are obviously quant-heavy (however the insurtech requires a broader, deeper skill set), and I was curious if either is a clear winner with the context of developing the skill set of a successful hedge fund manager. With public equities investing turning more quantitative as time goes along, the choice is less clear than it was 10 years ago.
Necessitatibus autem voluptas excepturi nisi doloremque saepe sit. Laboriosam nisi sint voluptatem quaerat error. Sint aut non sed aspernatur reprehenderit ut sequi ad. Possimus et quasi consequatur et quo ea harum.
Ut quaerat molestias et sint neque. Consequatur enim debitis quia eius assumenda. Provident maxime eum sunt.
Occaecati rerum incidunt pariatur maxime quidem minus. Rerum laborum officiis porro delectus quae et velit est. Commodi explicabo odit accusantium mollitia ducimus cumque neque earum.
Quae repudiandae rem minima sit at expedita eius voluptas. Eum alias impedit est atque rerum. Non voluptatem voluptate accusamus sequi. Ex sit non molestias sunt pariatur sint. Accusantium dolor nesciunt molestiae quidem.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...