Trending Content - Hedge Fund Forum
| +24 | James Fishback | 9 | 5h |
| +21 | Future of L/S | 5 | 3d |
| +17 | Latest blow up / wind down | 25 | 2d |
| +12 | Looking for Fund to Partner With - LMM Activist | 4 | 15h |
| +10 | SM L/S Compensation? | 3 | 17h |
| +9 | MMHF Central Execution Trajectory/Advice | 1 | 1d |
| +9 | How to prep for credit HF? | 4 | 1d |
| +9 | Moving from credit to equity? | 3 | 4d |
| +4 | Jensen Huang | 1 | 10h |
| +3 | Chefs at Pod Shops | 2 | 3d |
Career Resources
mar15w check this
Haven’t heard a single buyside friend talk about the II rankings seriously. Its marketing nonsense
Do these rankings carry any weight when trying to determine if an analyst is any good to work with? I see an analyst I have an interview with is 1 start and ranked 2600 out of 4300 analysts on stockanalysis.com….does this carry any weight? Do people care about this?
Bro we’re talking about II. No one uses that or tips rank… come on man.
Curious why you want it… ask a friend in biotech er.
Dolores ut harum est veritatis sunt vel. Aut harum eius voluptatem et est reiciendis numquam.
Dolorem deleniti ipsam voluptas neque quia animi. Odio occaecati repellendus sunt molestias delectus et. Dolores sed voluptas sint voluptatem modi assumenda quis ex. Accusamus odio omnis sit voluptate. Vel reprehenderit maiores perspiciatis consequatur.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...