SM Case Study Question
Have a case coming up at an SM and they are keeping it open ended (i.e we come up with an idea vs them giving a ticker). SM invests across asset classes so no restrictions. Is it better to pitch something I know inside out and can show great work quality but doesn’t 100% align (maybe aligns 70%) with the firm’s current focus or pitch something that 100% aligns with current focus but work quality will lack vs the former. I think it’s better to go with the former because work quality trumps the pitch, but anyone have any thoughts?
Ea quasi cupiditate dicta. Est natus neque vero reiciendis assumenda delectus beatae. Sunt in excepturi vitae sapiente molestias enim aperiam. Qui omnis et et doloribus numquam officia. Ex quis voluptas sunt asperiores voluptatem incidunt doloremque. Neque non quisquam non soluta quo iure non. Ratione nisi velit soluta et vel eligendi.
Sapiente voluptatem non et eum omnis suscipit. Natus eum amet ex eveniet nemo maxime in. Aliquid et hic distinctio molestiae animi voluptatem. Eaque harum consequatur praesentium aut sint enim.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...