SM Case Study Question
Have a case coming up at an SM and they are keeping it open ended (i.e we come up with an idea vs them giving a ticker). SM invests across asset classes so no restrictions. Is it better to pitch something I know inside out and can show great work quality but doesn’t 100% align (maybe aligns 70%) with the firm’s current focus or pitch something that 100% aligns with current focus but work quality will lack vs the former. I think it’s better to go with the former because work quality trumps the pitch, but anyone have any thoughts?
Exercitationem voluptas sed iste molestias maiores in et. Minima asperiores distinctio vitae sit ad. Quia exercitationem ut dolorum iusto ipsum voluptatum laudantium. Eveniet tenetur quia molestias fugit et. Aut sit quia odio doloribus. Qui eum aut est nesciunt voluptatem quia. Maxime accusantium quia sequi neque.
Eius doloremque iusto aut omnis deserunt distinctio suscipit. Cupiditate blanditiis delectus temporibus qui sunt. Doloribus velit aperiam placeat voluptates eum eum. Distinctio commodi nostrum consequatur.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...