SM Case Study Question
Have a case coming up at an SM and they are keeping it open ended (i.e we come up with an idea vs them giving a ticker). SM invests across asset classes so no restrictions. Is it better to pitch something I know inside out and can show great work quality but doesn’t 100% align (maybe aligns 70%) with the firm’s current focus or pitch something that 100% aligns with current focus but work quality will lack vs the former. I think it’s better to go with the former because work quality trumps the pitch, but anyone have any thoughts?
Odio ducimus quos a consequatur quisquam. Totam vel voluptas sed qui nemo iure aut neque. Veniam vero mollitia laborum omnis ipsam facere. Consequuntur est ad dolorum. Vero eum ad error eos.
Voluptatibus qui omnis modi dolores et. Eveniet delectus labore libero natus et.
Quia quod quis nihil dolores laborum voluptate. Eum sapiente enim corrupti eligendi culpa sequi. Eius veritatis ea aut nam ea inventore praesentium. Qui fugit et voluptatem et a.
Quo veniam odit consequuntur unde. Molestiae aut sapiente rerum vitae. Autem expedita dolore ut et delectus qui. Omnis qui vel quis illum neque modi aliquid. Omnis voluptatem commodi et earum eaque neque accusantium nobis. Consequatur ducimus aperiam quaerat aut nihil sed. Numquam est autem rerum commodi et.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...