Let's say AUM is $1-2bn. Team seems solid and from the screen you see they work a lot. Fund performance is not really meaningful since the fund is either 1 or 2 years old.
Let's say founders are a bunch of ex-bankers.
Would you think about joining this fund?
What if founders are ex-PMs?
| +28 | James Fishback | 10 | 8h |
| +21 | Future of L/S | 5 | 3d |
| +12 | Looking for Fund to Partner With - LMM Activist | 4 | 1d |
| +10 | SM L/S Compensation? | 3 | 1d |
| +9 | Moving from credit to equity? | 3 | 5d |
| +9 | MMHF Central Execution Trajectory/Advice | 1 | 2d |
| +9 | How to prep for credit HF? | 4 | 2d |
| +4 | Jensen Huang | 1 | 20h |
| +3 | Chefs at Pod Shops | 2 | 3d |
| +1 | Discerene Group | 2 | 1h |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
Billion plus aum after a few years is pretty rare and usually means the fund launched with significant institutional backing. Would have no problem joining a fund with this type of profile, if their strategy aligned with my interests.
BTW, there is almost no chance a fund would launch of this size founded by ex bankers.
Voluptatum nisi facere error aut eos sed qui. Id eos deleniti voluptate officiis labore voluptas ea. Quod rerum cum saepe voluptates voluptas fuga.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...