For those who’ve seen many thrive, fail or just do “fine” in the industry, curious to know your take on what sets a “great” analyst (and/or PM) apart from a “good” one? How quickly can you tell when someone has that moneymaker potential? What are the characteristics common to those individuals?
| +21 | Future of L/S | 5 | 2d |
| +17 | Latest blow up / wind down | 25 | 2d |
| +15 | James Fishback | 7 | 9h |
| +12 | Looking for Fund to Partner With - LMM Activist | 4 | 6h |
| +10 | SM L/S Compensation? | 3 | 8h |
| +9 | Moving from credit to equity? | 3 | 4d |
| +9 | MMHF Central Execution Trajectory/Advice | 1 | 1d |
| +9 | How to prep for credit HF? | 4 | 1d |
| +4 | Jensen Huang | 1 | 1h |
| +3 | Chefs at Pod Shops | 2 | 3d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
good luck
track record. I don't think there's a quick way to tell because everyone's good at talking and articulating how "good" their process is. track record is all that matters, past and present. There's a good post from a few days ago about bad PMs and characteristics
Someone who makes money
Idk uncanny ability to call regime shifts + uncanny ability to sniff good vs. bad fundamentals.
So Ze macro and micro?
Consequuntur rerum et placeat illum quas eligendi sunt velit. Ut dolorum aut deleniti et asperiores. Quisquam cum animi dolor aut voluptatem sequi quo. Ea eius quasi illo.
Iusto tempora omnis aut reprehenderit. Exercitationem quo esse eos aliquam consectetur. Consequatur voluptatem suscipit voluptatem voluptate. Magnam quia earum quibusdam qui non adipisci sint. Et repudiandae non qui quisquam quod dolorem. Aut consequatur non atque rem et.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...