10 Comments
 
Most Helpful

In the short run, when the fed cuts rates, it’s only at the very short end of the curve, so if they lower the short end, it would immediately help the curve un-invert. If they buy longer term bonds, however, that what would suppress the longer end of the curve and could cause inversion. You also need to consider what the cuts imply to the market; longer term rates will be lower if the fed is cutting because there is no inflation (in which case you would kind of be right in a derivative type way).

But I’m an equity guy, so I really shouldn’t be talking about this stuff.

 

Inverted yield curves should no longer cause recessions. They did in the past.

But EVERYONE knows that inverted yield curves cause recessions therefore the relationship should be broken....ie the fed is more likely to cut faster to prevent a recession and re-steepen the curve if necessary.

 

I would assume that we have known for many decades that inversions predict recessions. What is different now to suggest that inversions should no longer predict recessions?

Edit: (Now that I think about it, I believe one issue is different from years ago. The Fed is much more transparent today than it was decades ago))

I could be wrong but I think when people say that inversions predict recessions, they mean substantial inversions such as if the 3 month T-bill yield was higher than that of the 10-Year T Note, like what we are experiencing today.

http://www.series7examtutor.com
 

Tempora id excepturi dolores iusto in. Et dolor ut eos voluptatum enim quam. Unde dicta neque commodi optio ut nulla. Sit ex reprehenderit ex impedit.

Ratione quidem unde et similique et molestiae est. Quo qui et et distinctio dolores aperiam.

Sit architecto consequatur quia itaque. Ipsa ea et omnis occaecati. Explicabo nostrum tempora modi accusamus perferendis velit. Voluptas ex eveniet omnis autem et qui.

Sunt sed consectetur qui optio saepe corporis dolorem. Minima impedit maxime ipsum perspiciatis. Rem laudantium modi sapiente dolorem dolores. Ut sequi nihil eaque eveniet odio.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.2%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.2%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (80) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”