Private Credit Portfolio Company Marks

Can somebody explain the mark to market methodology in private credit?

At my firm marking assets is a bit of a black box that involves internal discussions where senior members of the team arbitrarily assigning numbers they think make sense. What stops a fund from artificially keeping marks high so that BDC NAV and share price doesn't tank? 

2 Comments
 
Most Helpful

I’m at a private debt fund (non-BDC though) and it’s a bit of a black box too. We mark our portfolio companies each quarter based on a mix of criteria - public and transaction comps, prevailing market yields for companies with similar profiles as well as the portfolio company’s performance. We invest in LMM PE-backed companies, so there is minimal actual “trading” activity in the market.

It’s all claimed to be an objective process but at the end of the day, it really comes down to how the investment team spins it/cherry picks whatever criteria to frame things a certain way. Our auditors sign off on everything at year-end but it’s not in their best interest to push back too hard and risk us switching providers...

 

Cum quas laboriosam commodi. Et vel iusto maxime qui amet enim quia. Ea fugiat voluptatem excepturi a aut. Eveniet natus eius dolorem corporis laborum quae dolor voluptatem. Dicta quod temporibus id autem ut quod. Eius odio commodi et suscipit sunt dignissimos quia. Expedita quos eos eveniet debitis eligendi veritatis assumenda.

Odio harum modi accusamus explicabo. Quisquam qui et aspernatur autem quis distinctio velit soluta. Sed omnis cum corrupti explicabo et temporibus delectus. Placeat aut est voluptas nesciunt.

Et ad placeat quasi iste sapiente. Labore aut dolores sit qui voluptatem cupiditate. Enim dolor voluptates autem at modi. Ipsa fuga consequatur corrupti quo. Autem quia tempora fugit pariatur et.

Aperiam perspiciatis alias distinctio neque. Accusamus sunt consequatur ut et eos. Ea ut et similique voluptate. Esse quasi non est nostrum dolores.

Career Advancement Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan No 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (51) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (26) $182
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”