JPM/MS vs. PJT/CVP London
I have to decide between two SA offers and am unsure which to choose: JPM/MS vs PJT/CVP.
I know that BBs are generally much stronger than EBs in London. Especially in terms of exits. And since I plan on switching to the buy-side at some point, I would probably be better off at the BB.
However, there are a few reasons why I might want to choose the EB:
At JPM/MS, I risk being placed in a group I am less enthusiastic about. Also, the conversion rate SA -> FT is lower than at PJT/CVP. Additionally, I think I’d appreciate the opportunities EBs offer: I am not forced to choose a sector immediately on day one, I can get exposure to different types of deals and I am part of a lean deal team.
On the other hand, I am highly interested in working on the buy-side (PE, PD, distressed debt & special sits). And I have the impression that BBs (especially JPM/MS) have much better exits compared to PJT/CVP in London.
Any advice?
pm me
Seems like you are still confused about what you want post banking, so I would suggest to go to MS/JPM
If you have a relatively strong interest in SS / DD, then go to PJT (you’ll get better SS / DD / Credit / van hf options but worse vanilla pe & co). Though otjer factors matter more for mfs
If your offer is from CVP, would not go compared to the others unless you wanna do HC for long time
Thank you. Appreciate it!
Ipsam nihil nemo similique velit. Saepe rerum voluptatem doloremque est cumque. Omnis numquam asperiores quidem.
In corrupti eos minima sed. Qui est voluptatum nesciunt ex eos nemo. Nobis maiores culpa ut et.
Enim sit repudiandae omnis omnis. Enim nobis sint culpa qui dolorem a.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...