Bring back the old WSO format

I'm not sure why WSO  can't grasp some realities about their site and realize that some of the updates and changes they implement (design, censorship, etc.) only distance the users that made this website what it is and a forum that caught the attention of others (because of their comments/humor, their advice, valuable threads, etc.). I mean, personally, what made me come back to WSO in the past years was reading some interesting comments and some more wiser comments by older users - nothing more, nothing less.

But some preliminary points to get to my idea:

  • The site is valuable only as long as there are users with enough experience to answer/guide/comment and provide thoughtful ideas/perspectives on different questions about careers/industry/etc.
  • What makes this site what it is is also scrolling through old threads from years ago and seeing how things have changed.
  • The familiarity makes one use it more often and more comfortably.

So, I can't see how WSO takes into account those 'realities' because the updates that were implemented lately to "modernize" WSO only devalue the forum because the real value of WSO resides in the past (old users, valuable threads in place, already in-place courses, etc.) and not in some type of modernization/financial educational revolution. This past should be maintained not through change and new additions, but solely through maintenance and fixing bugs - if that's achieved, the new users' part will take care of itself.

I get the mentality behind those updates: Wanting to attract new users and maybe make them buy some of the products, but each decision to attract new users just distances away the older ones (and maybe the latter are more helpful to attract new users than changing the interface, just saying).

If you don't believe my point, just take a look at the most-rated threads in the last 72 hours, because they're all #!%&$%#!% non-sense. I just can't cringe enough and feel a sense of disappointment looking through some of those threads. Also, the humor became so dry since a woke macha hippie BuzzFeed editor remarked WSO, that WSO just seems soulless.

So maybe my point is that the valuable or funny comments/threads are disappearing because of those updates, and instead, cringe threads/comments are on the rise/becoming more apparent because there is nothing to counterbalance those.

13 Comments
 

I know you're more talking about the way things used to be, and I understand where WSO is coming from, so it's a very difficult balance. Personally, one thing I'll add is that I don't like this new Reddit-style format, it makes it harder to sift through comments and a lot of the comments are clumped together a lot. I'm not a UX web designer by any means, but I liked the older, more bubbled out comments instead of the Reddit-style cascade, but that could just be a personal preference.

Quant (ˈkwänt) n: An expert, someone who knows more and more about less and less until they know everything about nothing.
 
Most Helpful

When you create a comment, I feel like the comment dropdown line (idk how to describe it) should be a bit bolder to stand out more, like this (it's a bit too thing imo, but that's just personal preference):

image-20230828112617-1

Quant (ˈkwänt) n: An expert, someone who knows more and more about less and less until they know everything about nothing.
 

Eligendi voluptas explicabo eum est. Vitae rerum minus consequuntur eius est ea consequatur. Eveniet amet est distinctio repellendus natus similique aspernatur. Labore ut et expedita ratione sint neque eos dicta.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • Guggenheim Partners No 97.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.2%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.2%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (23) $182
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (81) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”