JP Morgan Generalist VS Barclays Nat Res
This has been resolved. No need for further responses or discussion about the topic. Thanks though for the help
Trending Content - Off Topic Forum
| +19 | How do we get as sharp as possible? | 9 | 1d |
| +17 | Q&A | Analyst | 8 | 2d |
| +14 | Best way to kill time? | 9 | 18h |
| +12 | Upselling yourself when you’re unqualified | 1 | 2d |
| +12 | How Are Cornell 7 / GC Members Affecting Your Bank or Firm? | 5 | 6h |
| +5 | Deciding what Keyboard is the best | 12 | 1d |
| +2 | NYC Froyo Spots as Investment Banks | 1 | 25m |
| 0 | Analyst Y1 - Messed up In First Week | 0 | 3d |
Career Resources
A year ago I would've said Barclays nat res hands down - they were a stronger group than anything at JPM aside from Healthcare.
However they've lost most of their top guys. Skip McGee left a while ago to start Intrepid, Brad Hutchinson went to BAML and I hear Greg Pipkin is retiring to start a PE fund. That just leaves Lee Jacobe in terms of their core team and who knows how long he'll stick around. Still a good shop though but don't expect it to live up to its reputation going forward.
Also exits at BARC would be heavily stacked towards natural resources.
Great thanks for the response, just to clarify it's the nat res group in NYC not in Houston. Would that factor into your decision at all?
Ex explicabo mollitia voluptatem non rerum. Eius debitis quia quia id eos. Repellat praesentium itaque amet quia dolores non quae sint. Voluptatem commodi dicta a alias quod et nisi laboriosam. Ut qui quia est veritatis autem animi.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...