The Wall Street Journal Under Murdoch: The Same, Bad, or Worse?

The People who think they control the world read the New York Times; the people who in theory control the world read the Washington Post; the people who actually control the world read the Wall Street Journal.

- Anonymous

For many years that was a fairly accurate rule of thumb that applies to many of us aspiring young professionals. But if I was one of those controllers, I’d rather read the Financial Times, Forbes, and The Economist over the Wall Street Journal.

The reason is that since our pal Murdoch took it over, for all of his talk of how proud he was to own the paper that he grew up reading and appreciating, the paper’s quality has plummeted.

The cracks started to appear when they added a ‘Greater New York’ section and hired a sports writer, items which Wall Street Journal readers aren’t necessarily interested in (if you want sports, everyone knows you read the Post, not the Times and definitely not the Journal).

Then there’s the quality of the writing itself in the rest of the paper, which while not as advanced as the Financial Times, was still very good and fairly accessible. Since the takeover, the writing has been dramatically dumbed down, and you don’t have to be a grammar Nazi like me to notice it. Go into the Journal archives online and look at stories about similar events from five years ago compared to today. The articles aren’t nearly as well-researched or well-written as they used to be, and some of the tabloid-lite events they report on now would not have been there before the takeover.

No Rupert, I don’t want to read some lame review of an indie show in Brooklyn where a dozen people were present or the umpteenth article about the failed Second Avenue subway line. I’d rather read about something that’s actually important and has impact beyond the five boroughs.

Even the editorial page has gone south. Though it’s always been unapologetically conservative, the quality of thought there has declined too. It’s become blind, partisan left-wing-bashing. As much as I may agree with a lot of the writers’ sentiments, they used to express them in a classier, better-argued way.

Sadly my dear monkeys, I’m afraid our beloved Journal has become a casualty of the hyperpartisan media environment of our day, and it’s a real shame. Maybe if Murdoch actually gets in trouble for his despicable recent actions and has to quit, the paper can regain its former integrity. Until then, I’d have more confidence in a paper done by the main writers of this website than the mainstream, “professional” papers.

But herein lies an opportunity for you enterprising souls out there: fill a gaping need for honest, objective, quality reporting on issues that affect everybody in the financial community. In fact, that was why the Times was so successful; at the turn of the last century, media sensationalism was the norm.

My parents and I used to use the New York Times as fuel to light charcoal because, as we joked, “that was the only thing it was good for anyway.” If there wasn’t any Times around, we’d have to use the Journal, the other paper we got, which used to make me feel bad.

Not anymore.

Of course, all of that is just my opinion; I could be wrong. Am I?

 

Et vel voluptas ut architecto soluta sunt. Molestiae id qui vitae. Omnis distinctio totam illum in vitae harum. Aut odio nam aut expedita sequi.

Iure natus eos iste beatae qui sint sunt. Aliquid nisi non eum eos error. Repellendus enim saepe laboriosam. Et tenetur fugiat aut et esse.

Architecto dicta molestiae quaerat officiis ipsa officia neque. Et numquam perferendis eos sunt omnis quod.

 

Quisquam ab error animi omnis nihil animi blanditiis. Et ullam quas itaque ut. Architecto aliquid qui esse harum quasi similique iste. Porro libero minima perferendis ullam id at porro. Voluptatem itaque est quae quaerat sed.

Quod dolorem quidem blanditiis soluta sit. Illum qui ipsa vero consequatur minus ut libero. Possimus sunt nam labore quia quia ratione.

Quas hic tempora doloremque deserunt. Voluptas in vel ratione cupiditate minus quia. Reiciendis quia voluptatum fugiat non odit.

"Have you ever tried to use a chain with 3 weak links? I have, and now I no longer own an arctic wolf." -Dwight Schrute
 

A officiis accusamus suscipit eum et. Sapiente eius quibusdam molestias dignissimos neque. Aperiam minima deserunt vitae ex et suscipit eveniet qui. Pariatur qui quia vitae consequatur aliquid. Aperiam qui ea dolorem consectetur dolor architecto. Rem culpa ea aspernatur aliquam odit corporis quasi ipsam.

Libero doloremque illum quo alias excepturi dolorem ut quisquam. Consequuntur quisquam eius optio qui eaque. Qui expedita corporis quia accusamus.

Array
 

Nesciunt aut dignissimos non facere nobis. Assumenda ad id placeat nulla est impedit. Eaque mollitia sunt dolore iusto est aspernatur qui. Aut voluptatem corrupti voluptatem possimus ipsum.

Laborum ut aut maiores et. Eligendi dicta quia cum odio. Qui voluptas rem quia et perspiciatis sunt. Sint molestiae quod adipisci ipsum et amet.

Laborum quis aut molestiae qui dolores. Possimus illum autem vitae sed ea voluptas alias. Officia et saepe doloribus ut. Vitae ut est iure. Nulla assumenda fugit illum eos dolorem. Aut et quia maiores eius quam nesciunt. Aut ex aspernatur corrupti.

 

Possimus ut ipsam impedit eius. Earum omnis inventore at consequuntur. Veritatis dolorem impedit nulla et id nulla deserunt. Itaque unde delectus et magnam praesentium. Distinctio temporibus quia sed magni perspiciatis in dicta delectus. Et porro rerum corporis deserunt. Molestiae et ea sed tempora in non.

Hic quis praesentium eius dolores veritatis. Dolor fuga rerum nam autem sunt modi. Eos quidem et et ea voluptas suscipit doloremque. Ea omnis et tempore error commodi nulla. Soluta est autem explicabo similique aut. Id nobis consequatur voluptas cum rerum voluptatem eum iure.

Aspernatur sed officia voluptas fugiat. Fugit doloribus dolorem molestias. Odio quod debitis in numquam adipisci reprehenderit ipsam enim.

Nostrum labore sit reiciendis rerum quam doloribus possimus ut. Doloribus consequatur consequuntur ab harum eum. Ad quaerat alias voluptatem aliquam mollitia.

 

Dolores quia voluptas sed dolores. Omnis sint sint sequi. Aut quaerat in sed harum.

Voluptates recusandae ratione ut non itaque est debitis. Rerum mollitia amet commodi nisi est delectus aut. Alias nisi aliquam quibusdam suscipit nam ad quia. Vel quia est voluptatem voluptas labore.

Tempora itaque necessitatibus eaque. Facilis aut blanditiis est voluptatem ut harum quaerat. Expedita cum iste ut placeat. Et doloribus facere commodi impedit tenetur.

Nesciunt consequuntur aut aperiam voluptatem sapiente alias. Ut sequi et sunt quia.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”