Secretive vs Universal Prestige?

Is universally/widely known prestige or secretive, in-the-know prestige more prestigious?


Take for example working at CVP where everyone knows you're THE top dog on the sell-side and renowned globally and universally even outside of finance. 


Or working at Allen & Co where everyone in a select group knows you're THE top dog on the sell-side and people who bother to search your white-shoe firm up after you tell them where you work will be enlightened, but at the same time you can fly under the radar for non-high finance folks. 


I think CVP is obviously prestigious to a much greater number of people (~8bn population VS ~50K in-the-know high financiers who recognize Allen & Co).


But there is a certain prestige associated with the fact that only prestigious people will recognize your firm for what it truly it (apex predator among independent advisory boutiques).


Which one is more prestigious?

 

Based on the discussions and insights from Wall Street Oasis, the concept of prestige in the finance industry can indeed vary significantly between being universally recognized and being prestigious within a knowledgeable, niche group. Here’s a breakdown of the two types of prestige you mentioned:

  1. Universal/Widely Known Prestige (e.g., CVP):

    • Broad Recognition: Firms like CVP are recognized not just within the finance industry but also by the general public. This type of prestige comes from a firm's visible impact on significant, global financial deals and its presence in mainstream media.
    • Career Opportunities: Working at a universally prestigious firm often opens doors across various sectors, not just in finance, due to the brand's strength and recognition.
    • Public Perception: Being part of such a firm can enhance one's professional profile significantly in a wide array of social and professional circles.
  2. Secretive/In-the-Know Prestige (e.g., Allen & Co):

    • Niche Recognition: These firms hold a high level of respect and prestige among those who are deeply embedded in the finance industry. Their prestige is often tied to specialized knowledge and a deep understanding of the industry.
    • Selective Networking: The recognition comes from peers who are equally knowledgeable and influential, which can create powerful, high-quality networking opportunities.
    • Exclusivity: There is a unique prestige associated with being part of a firm that is known only to those within a certain echelon of the finance world. This can be appealing to professionals who value privacy and exclusivity.

In terms of which is more prestigious, it largely depends on one's career goals and values. For those aiming for wide recognition and opportunities across various industries, a universally prestigious firm like CVP might be more appealing. However, for individuals who value deep industry respect and niche networking, a secretive firm like Allen & Co could hold more prestige.

Ultimately, both types of prestige carry their own weight and benefits, and the choice between them can be subjective, depending on personal and professional priorities.

Sources: Does Prestige in Commercial Real Estate Development Exist? Google/Blackstone/McKinsey equivalents?, Is Prestige Really All That Important?, Most Prestigious Corporate Finance Company, Why so much focus on prestige in IB?, Rank these degrees in terms of prestige

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

1. The only thing "prestige" is good for is money. Go with whichever place will set you up for earning the most cash over the course of your whole career

2. There's nowhere close to 8 billion people who even know what investment banking is. You think Chinese factory workers, Indian farmers, Latvian priests all care about IB?

3. Among the laypeople who know what IB is, GS is way better known than CVP

 

Voluptatem asperiores nobis rerum qui. Dolorem dolores dignissimos et qui enim officiis eveniet. Neque dolor ut officiis cum iste saepe id libero. Non rerum quia rerum voluptates aut quis.

Sed voluptatibus dolorem dolorum velit. Est et architecto recusandae quia et.

Quia deleniti facilis aut suscipit vero excepturi vel. Blanditiis consequatur facere et.

Et est quod occaecati id neque eligendi dolores. Optio praesentium voluptatem sit possimus possimus. Et delectus qui temporibus ut qui cum hic. Et harum ipsa aut voluptatem.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 04 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (88) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (67) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
numi's picture
numi
98.8
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”