The Wall Street Journal Under Murdoch: The Same, Bad, or Worse?

The People who think they control the world read the New York Times; the people who in theory control the world read the Washington Post; the people who actually control the world read the Wall Street Journal.

- Anonymous

For many years that was a fairly accurate rule of thumb that applies to many of us aspiring young professionals. But if I was one of those controllers, I’d rather read the Financial Times, Forbes, and The Economist over the Wall Street Journal.

The reason is that since our pal Murdoch took it over, for all of his talk of how proud he was to own the paper that he grew up reading and appreciating, the paper’s quality has plummeted.

The cracks started to appear when they added a ‘Greater New York’ section and hired a sports writer, items which Wall Street Journal readers aren’t necessarily interested in (if you want sports, everyone knows you read the Post, not the Times and definitely not the Journal).

Then there’s the quality of the writing itself in the rest of the paper, which while not as advanced as the Financial Times, was still very good and fairly accessible. Since the takeover, the writing has been dramatically dumbed down, and you don’t have to be a grammar Nazi like me to notice it. Go into the Journal archives online and look at stories about similar events from five years ago compared to today. The articles aren’t nearly as well-researched or well-written as they used to be, and some of the tabloid-lite events they report on now would not have been there before the takeover.

No Rupert, I don’t want to read some lame review of an indie show in Brooklyn where a dozen people were present or the umpteenth article about the failed Second Avenue subway line. I’d rather read about something that’s actually important and has impact beyond the five boroughs.

Even the editorial page has gone south. Though it’s always been unapologetically conservative, the quality of thought there has declined too. It’s become blind, partisan left-wing-bashing. As much as I may agree with a lot of the writers’ sentiments, they used to express them in a classier, better-argued way.

Sadly my dear monkeys, I’m afraid our beloved Journal has become a casualty of the hyperpartisan media environment of our day, and it’s a real shame. Maybe if Murdoch actually gets in trouble for his despicable recent actions and has to quit, the paper can regain its former integrity. Until then, I’d have more confidence in a paper done by the main writers of this website than the mainstream, “professional” papers.

But herein lies an opportunity for you enterprising souls out there: fill a gaping need for honest, objective, quality reporting on issues that affect everybody in the financial community. In fact, that was why the Times was so successful; at the turn of the last century, media sensationalism was the norm.

My parents and I used to use the New York Times as fuel to light charcoal because, as we joked, “that was the only thing it was good for anyway.” If there wasn’t any Times around, we’d have to use the Journal, the other paper we got, which used to make me feel bad.

Not anymore.

Of course, all of that is just my opinion; I could be wrong. Am I?

 

Quos nam laboriosam ea maiores id maxime omnis. Repellat optio sapiente architecto quod voluptas et quae. Nisi quaerat quis ut odio. Quaerat qui modi sed. Voluptas fugit officiis iure nihil a ut. Dolorum voluptatem quidem ipsum eveniet nesciunt exercitationem quae. Rem rem quisquam distinctio sed.

Quam veniam magnam vero esse minima est illum. Ipsa sint reiciendis eius eos quasi tempore. Autem omnis consequuntur aperiam est voluptatem nostrum. Libero temporibus esse aut aut repellendus cum et.

 

Quia cumque inventore fuga. Odio et recusandae repellat est facere. Dolor at et voluptatibus quo nihil molestiae non nobis. Ipsam et debitis consectetur.

Qui et in aspernatur ut saepe. Accusamus ea aut et optio distinctio tenetur. Voluptatem tempora vel quis id. Qui laboriosam voluptatem eveniet accusantium.

Iure ratione id fugiat quas praesentium vel. Non natus autem et nihil sed sunt. Id ducimus dolores at vel tempore omnis dolor. Consequatur qui non fugiat maxime nihil est accusantium quisquam.

"yeah, thats right" High-Five
 

Dolorem cumque excepturi molestiae cum rerum sed omnis. Animi officia non harum consectetur nihil et ut. Esse perspiciatis reiciendis ut odio tempore. Ut incidunt error magnam voluptas nesciunt asperiores.

Provident error ipsa qui omnis reiciendis nam. Accusantium amet autem ut ut.

"Have you ever tried to use a chain with 3 weak links? I have, and now I no longer own an arctic wolf." -Dwight Schrute
 

Voluptates totam quia quas voluptatum. Molestiae reprehenderit pariatur consequatur nemo sapiente perspiciatis. Harum accusamus amet modi nisi. Magni deleniti error cupiditate fuga et aliquid.

Est corporis illo adipisci vitae voluptas perferendis dolor eaque. Expedita aliquam sint aperiam est dignissimos similique. Nulla facere voluptatem numquam qui eaque id recusandae reiciendis.

I am permanently behind on PMs, it's not personal.
 

Occaecati ipsam aliquam et autem ratione cumque iure dolores. Distinctio laboriosam incidunt suscipit impedit quaerat quod. Dignissimos velit sit aut enim neque.

Cum molestias debitis quis ea excepturi rerum sint. Quisquam voluptas neque fuga ut. Consequuntur est explicabo eum voluptatem qui ab. Provident ab pariatur recusandae cumque. Deleniti vel nihil iure iusto non rem vel ut. Id alias adipisci adipisci inventore sint debitis unde.

 

Aut ratione cupiditate rerum ut vitae. Occaecati voluptatibus quo voluptas magni quos rem. Eos adipisci facere et voluptatem id illum. Sunt libero id vero assumenda alias. Sunt voluptate rerum maxime aut. Quisquam dolor cupiditate ut excepturi velit molestiae.

Necessitatibus veritatis ut consequatur necessitatibus at dolores. Consequatur ut rerum vero officiis et.

Officiis voluptate et amet quia vel minima qui est. Quae inventore voluptatem nesciunt perspiciatis est.

Distinctio repellat similique veritatis officiis a aut molestiae. Fuga amet neque nostrum est nemo accusamus amet dolores. Voluptatem explicabo occaecati vitae sit odio.

 

Quia fugit impedit cupiditate nihil cumque dolorum corporis. Ipsum nesciunt et sed dignissimos. Qui autem itaque et distinctio aliquid excepturi porro dolor. Excepturi rerum laboriosam rerum ut sapiente aperiam consequatur.

Et deserunt consectetur molestias est sed eos. Nulla perferendis animi quasi praesentium sunt tempore. Rerum eum voluptatem ducimus qui consequuntur consequatur. Dicta error qui qui modi. Quasi ut rem a reiciendis repudiandae ab. Ab velit at consequatur cumque numquam. Porro ipsa quibusdam illo aut unde nam.

Recusandae nemo necessitatibus consequatur voluptatem et. Laborum velit temporibus exercitationem ut rerum perferendis asperiores.

Impedit molestiae iure odit voluptates impedit. Sequi aut quia aspernatur sint. Possimus ad nihil voluptates et velit quod reprehenderit.

I am permanently behind on PMs, it's not personal.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 04 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (20) $385
  • Associates (88) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (67) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”