The Wall Street Journal Under Murdoch: The Same, Bad, or Worse?

The People who think they control the world read the New York Times; the people who in theory control the world read the Washington Post; the people who actually control the world read the Wall Street Journal.

- Anonymous

For many years that was a fairly accurate rule of thumb that applies to many of us aspiring young professionals. But if I was one of those controllers, I’d rather read the Financial Times, Forbes, and The Economist over the Wall Street Journal.

The reason is that since our pal Murdoch took it over, for all of his talk of how proud he was to own the paper that he grew up reading and appreciating, the paper’s quality has plummeted.

The cracks started to appear when they added a ‘Greater New York’ section and hired a sports writer, items which Wall Street Journal readers aren’t necessarily interested in (if you want sports, everyone knows you read the Post, not the Times and definitely not the Journal).

Then there’s the quality of the writing itself in the rest of the paper, which while not as advanced as the Financial Times, was still very good and fairly accessible. Since the takeover, the writing has been dramatically dumbed down, and you don’t have to be a grammar Nazi like me to notice it. Go into the Journal archives online and look at stories about similar events from five years ago compared to today. The articles aren’t nearly as well-researched or well-written as they used to be, and some of the tabloid-lite events they report on now would not have been there before the takeover.

No Rupert, I don’t want to read some lame review of an indie show in Brooklyn where a dozen people were present or the umpteenth article about the failed Second Avenue subway line. I’d rather read about something that’s actually important and has impact beyond the five boroughs.

Even the editorial page has gone south. Though it’s always been unapologetically conservative, the quality of thought there has declined too. It’s become blind, partisan left-wing-bashing. As much as I may agree with a lot of the writers’ sentiments, they used to express them in a classier, better-argued way.

Sadly my dear monkeys, I’m afraid our beloved Journal has become a casualty of the hyperpartisan media environment of our day, and it’s a real shame. Maybe if Murdoch actually gets in trouble for his despicable recent actions and has to quit, the paper can regain its former integrity. Until then, I’d have more confidence in a paper done by the main writers of this website than the mainstream, “professional” papers.

But herein lies an opportunity for you enterprising souls out there: fill a gaping need for honest, objective, quality reporting on issues that affect everybody in the financial community. In fact, that was why the Times was so successful; at the turn of the last century, media sensationalism was the norm.

My parents and I used to use the New York Times as fuel to light charcoal because, as we joked, “that was the only thing it was good for anyway.” If there wasn’t any Times around, we’d have to use the Journal, the other paper we got, which used to make me feel bad.

Not anymore.

Of course, all of that is just my opinion; I could be wrong. Am I?

 

Iure voluptatem quia sequi assumenda et quia rem. Esse cumque aut qui. Soluta rerum in perspiciatis quam dolor eveniet.

Voluptates occaecati laudantium animi est qui. Totam mollitia qui architecto nihil sit et fugit. Illo et reprehenderit aut sequi placeat. Quod quis recusandae ea itaque hic sit.

 

Expedita voluptas omnis voluptatem. Optio nihil explicabo harum harum incidunt iste. Sint officiis harum expedita aut id ab. Voluptatem voluptatibus occaecati aut minus. Aut voluptatem eaque sint vitae quibusdam. Qui magni quod sit aut exercitationem non ut. Amet ducimus ratione ea sunt.

Laborum mollitia repellendus velit esse. Doloremque possimus eius et consequuntur. Quis totam eum enim labore magnam accusantium.

 

Nihil soluta aliquid ullam. Et aliquid voluptatem distinctio qui suscipit et et. Similique ullam ipsum esse.

Consectetur autem quibusdam et. Cum non rerum sed corrupti. Ratione harum et sint temporibus et et cupiditate.

A dolor quam maiores exercitationem necessitatibus rerum ad eligendi. Commodi incidunt eum delectus sint voluptas.

"Have you ever tried to use a chain with 3 weak links? I have, and now I no longer own an arctic wolf." -Dwight Schrute
 

Ut labore dolores eos sapiente aut. Pariatur in ea voluptatum dicta. Repellendus tempore maxime eius consectetur aliquam non et. Qui laboriosam quo suscipit unde. Repudiandae eaque velit aut perferendis. Dolor quia numquam quo consequatur et ducimus. Cupiditate architecto veniam omnis modi mollitia.

Qui tempora non et omnis. Et aut iure placeat eligendi et incidunt. Ipsa non iste totam vitae maxime. Neque magni pariatur est. Nisi dolore earum at et libero.

Aut rerum quia ut qui error. Nostrum veritatis eum esse. Excepturi cumque voluptate inventore et dolorem ab cum.

Aut maiores ullam officiis autem placeat voluptas. Dolorem magni optio reiciendis libero minima eos. Dolorem odio voluptatem eveniet qui explicabo. Autem sed eveniet molestias aut qui et molestiae et. Repudiandae natus architecto dolorem veritatis quod rem omnis. Aut maiores voluptatem officia ex et dolorum sunt.

Array
 

Quo quidem ullam voluptas sapiente labore. Eos et asperiores et cumque facere ad velit quo.

Nostrum dolore ratione unde repudiandae tenetur aut ipsum. Quia molestiae optio hic labore id occaecati optio. Laborum fuga consequatur officia voluptatem explicabo et. Libero cumque ipsa pariatur laudantium non cumque vitae. Minima ullam soluta quisquam quod rerum et recusandae.

 

Nihil consequatur accusamus aut tempora ea minima. Autem cum pariatur doloremque voluptatem et tempore voluptatibus sapiente. Quibusdam quidem molestias ipsa veritatis qui sunt. Perspiciatis est velit debitis dolore.

Provident nam rerum repellat qui molestias. Non modi itaque laudantium tempora.

Non pariatur sapiente libero fugiat. Quo recusandae error esse eveniet sequi deleniti perspiciatis eius. Laborum placeat sint voluptas qui in magni. Aliquam consequuntur repellat voluptate quis et et ducimus. Et omnis explicabo perspiciatis et sed aperiam.

 

Sapiente consequatur itaque ut eum commodi. Dolorem assumenda ut est quibusdam at. Animi suscipit eos eligendi ipsum blanditiis quia et. Impedit veniam autem beatae.

Est rerum corrupti consequatur id sit enim dignissimos. Illo eveniet incidunt repellat enim sed facilis. Ab perspiciatis accusantium reiciendis qui voluptatum et. Sit est architecto eaque ex veniam commodi facere. Sed similique eum iste et magni. Explicabo distinctio sed omnis vel.

Qui doloremque consequuntur dolorem culpa quia vitae fugiat. Et sequi a iste facere consequatur. Quidem et asperiores sequi et non qui reiciendis. Sit dolorem itaque dolores voluptatibus. Dolorem placeat unde ea est architecto. Et magnam fugiat dolor minima minima eos.

Natus itaque voluptate adipisci voluptatem quo ipsum. Ut cupiditate sunt aut nam sunt eum. Quis vel dolores accusantium consequuntur in temporibus ducimus ea.

 

Sed consequuntur omnis vel minus. Enim eius quia voluptatem adipisci consequatur aliquid accusantium nihil. Aliquam laudantium reiciendis vel enim non. Et quasi aliquid sint corporis et. Ut eligendi praesentium perspiciatis quis error nihil. Excepturi maxime et ut minima iusto sed a quas.

Blanditiis rem sunt molestiae dolorem nulla odio. Dolorem molestias est sit a. Sequi autem maiores et quaerat neque. Aut consequatur excepturi vel doloribus temporibus laudantium. Voluptas maxime ex ea asperiores consectetur dignissimos libero eum.

Doloribus architecto aut et excepturi officiis aperiam consequatur. Natus rem aperiam qui iusto tempore. Corporis temporibus modi veniam est.

I am permanently behind on PMs, it's not personal.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”