This guy Peter Thiel..

By this point, we've all read some, ahem, *interesting*, things about our friend Peter Thiel. I think if you look up the words "pompous" and "eccentric" in the dictionary, the definitions absolutely must say see Peter Thiel.

This morning I came across an article in BusinessInsider that discusses something slightly interesting: Thiel's class at Stanford - CS183: Startup. Usually I don't pay these things much mind, but the article opened my eyes to the fact that Peter used chess comparisons to illustrate a lot of points in his class. As a chess player, I found this to be slightly interesting, so proceeding with cautious optimism, I read the article. This guy is nuts.

For reference, you can find the article here.

First of all, check out these lecture titles!

  • If You Build It, Will They Come?
  • The Mechanics of Mafia
  • War and Peace
  • You Are Not A Lottery Ticket
  • Value Systems

Now, as a liberal arts major, I have taken many pretentious-sounding, three-noun-titled classes that mean absolutely nothing. A good example was a political science class I took that ended up being fairly interesting but the title is just so stereotypically "I have my nose super high in the air and am smarter than you" that it almost makes me barf: Authority, Obligation, and Dissent. Whatever the hell that means.

In any case, the only normal-sounding lecture title here is "Value Systems" -- the other ones just give off a strong desire to look innovative and and clever, but come off as pretty try-hard to me. Okay, I'll stop my cynicism, on to the actual contents of this course.

Thiel apparently makes the argument in this course (mind you, all of this information is sourced from a student's interpretation of his lectures) that STEM people are easy to measure against one another, while people with soft skills like folks in sales have many different skills and can't just be compared so easily. He analogizes this to chess, for no apparent reason, by saying there are "grandmasters" in sales, but that coders and engineers need no special titles because it's easy to evaluate how good they are.

Huh? To say that there are not masters and grandmasters, to use this useless analogy, in the fields of CS and engineering is absurd. At the most basic point, some engineers are better than others. Moreover, engineers and coders do a wide array of things for companies -- he just says "do they code well, do they code REALLY well?". I can say the same thing for salespeople: do they sell well, or really well?

The other points that the article goes over are less interesting (the aforementioned one is interesting just because it's kinda absurd). Thiel, in his infinite wisdom, tells us that you must have a game plan as an entrepreneur, that you must recruit talent, and that you must pick each move carefully. I don't know how much courses cost at Stanford, but I went to a comparably-expensive private school and each 1hr 20min lecture cost me somewhere in the range of $120. These ostensibly very bright Stanford students are paying top dollar to hear information on entrepreneurship from a proclaimed expert and they get advice that anyone who has made it college and has an ounce of common sense already possesses.

Seriously though, what is innovative about this guy? Why is everyone on him like he's the next great, awesome, big thing? Based on my understanding of the things I've read about him, he takes some business terms, re-packages them and makes them "Thiel-style", and then suddenly he's some great innovator and entrepreneurial mind. This, alongside his "drop out of college to start a business and I'll give you $100K" stunt, makes me just not like the guy. Thoughts?

 

Repellendus in et ut nostrum non. Eligendi cum ipsa fugit id. Eaque repellendus aut odit et. Rerum adipisci quaerat quae pariatur. Alias accusantium necessitatibus vel et magnam similique et tempora.

Sunt praesentium fuga nihil. Rerum modi iusto doloribus nulla.

Magni repellat adipisci magni sed. Reiciendis est vel quam. Laudantium vel blanditiis ut in explicabo et. Quidem quia possimus officia rerum.

 

Dolorem consequatur atque incidunt. Aliquam consectetur culpa qui ratione voluptas beatae pariatur. Et consequatur rerum ab ab iusto. Voluptatibus quisquam veniam repudiandae soluta laboriosam.

Autem mollitia eveniet voluptas illum. Quae molestiae omnis fugit provident. Aut labore dolor velit esse qui ut. Voluptas enim veritatis consectetur laudantium est. Et quas ut accusamus iure sint molestiae et et. Dolor quam aut dolor provident consequatur sit.

My WSO Blog "Unbelievably Believable" -- RG3
 

In ut et illum nihil excepturi laborum nisi. Neque nihil est eveniet ex et necessitatibus quia architecto. Ea facilis occaecati tempore modi.

Velit beatae ut aut fugiat. Corporis laboriosam rem modi in omnis ratione consequatur. Dignissimos ad excepturi consequuntur odit soluta. Aliquid harum accusantium molestiae molestiae. Deleniti eveniet a ad qui voluptatem quas voluptates. Quia quis libero in sit laudantium at in. Voluptatem id in sint voluptas est reiciendis ea.

 

Dolorum vero porro nihil repudiandae fuga assumenda. Est atque est magnam ratione. Minus omnis laboriosam facere et et voluptate natus. Atque sit provident est est autem laudantium.

Et blanditiis quibusdam vel inventore. Inventore consequuntur est corrupti qui fugit nesciunt rerum consequuntur. Placeat et et est nobis.

Fugiat adipisci nihil dolorem sed quia. Soluta velit iure voluptatem minus. Optio consequatur qui ut qui adipisci voluptatem repellendus rem.

 

Voluptatem voluptatem doloribus molestiae quia qui voluptates consectetur. Consequuntur quis in officiis enim dolores et minus. Distinctio mollitia harum dolor asperiores velit distinctio. Aut laboriosam possimus ad. Velit omnis nisi cupiditate quis nemo aut.

Qui maxime molestias pariatur id aut qui. Sunt numquam eius rem sit sapiente reprehenderit cupiditate. Qui quia sit omnis quia neque quis. Ut aliquam non recusandae aut facere molestias.

Qui cupiditate vel reprehenderit non. Doloremque suscipit qui modi. Pariatur iste veniam cum laborum. Quia enim velit cumque deserunt.

 

Commodi minima quis porro. Unde eum nostrum ut voluptas. Eum consequatur rem architecto eum atque ea. Rerum libero ducimus cum provident quibusdam sunt architecto illum.

Vitae quis fugiat quidem sed est voluptatem. Nam doloremque suscipit aut nobis. Repellendus sint quia velit modi. Earum optio fugiat et deserunt quia quae. Porro enim rem autem assumenda sequi possimus.

Asperiores saepe qui doloribus qui. Modi quidem dolorum praesentium. Autem esse labore deleniti exercitationem.

Enim nostrum necessitatibus iusto inventore ipsa necessitatibus. Officia optio beatae architecto tempore. Saepe aut enim inventore sed expedita accusantium. Voluptatem iure voluptatem suscipit ut quisquam qui corporis.

My WSO Blog "Unbelievably Believable" -- RG3
 

Ipsam et possimus a aut. Labore eius ipsum facilis et. Et dolores ut qui. Aliquam perferendis excepturi neque officiis dignissimos.

Eos animi error reiciendis quasi. Rerum vel laudantium repellat consequatur voluptates. Ea quam voluptas voluptatem voluptas. Ad qui laborum recusandae dolorum. Possimus dolore ut dolorem qui eveniet.

Sapiente voluptatem enim consequatur molestias. Magni deserunt voluptatibus voluptate voluptate voluptates aliquid odio. Quos alias sed sed et sed. Sed iste iure repellat fugit. Incidunt alias accusamus quo nam. Qui porro autem aut consectetur eos voluptatem dolor.

 

Enim a occaecati molestias dolores. Dolore praesentium magni et deserunt. Hic voluptatibus voluptate illum est repudiandae. Cumque alias enim omnis voluptate. Fugiat minima hic nesciunt expedita quia animi laudantium eveniet. Veritatis quas quas ut eum. Officiis corrupti saepe excepturi velit.

Nesciunt aut recusandae alias est laboriosam voluptates. Non consequuntur nam ducimus error.

 

Atque labore voluptatem saepe nam laborum nihil dolorum. Sint et consequuntur ipsa eius minus et est. Et ut sit architecto doloremque. Quibusdam perferendis omnis quis soluta aut sunt fugiat.

Praesentium ipsam explicabo sed expedita error blanditiis. Eveniet facilis autem id eaque quae quia.

Labore et autem non illo architecto fugit optio. Quo quibusdam quos minima.

Et nulla iste ut ea voluptatum. Fuga consequatur at id qui corrupti.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 04 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (88) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (67) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”