Mezzanine Finance: What exactly do you do here?

Anyone who has taken a basic corporate finance class has probably run across the ambiguous term of junior debt. But what exactly does that mean and who exactly are the people working in the trenches. I had the opportunity to work with one of the more successful middle market mezzanine finance firms in the greater philadelphia/delaware/new jersey area and figured I'd provide some insight to try and help pay back all of the lurking I did over the past year and a half.

So to start with the basics, why do people even use mezzanine financing and how does it work? The most basic form of a capital structure within a company generally goes senior debt, junior debt, and equity. Senior debt is pretty well known; a large bank (TD, PNC, BoA, etc.) is willing to lend at modest rates in return for a first claim on hard assets (inventory, equipment, property, contracts). Banks tend to be very careful lenders though. The other common route for generating cash to grow your business is by raising equity. However, there becomes a certain point when the bank has no more assets to lend against and you don't want to dilute your equity any further (especially when EBITDA is $5-$10MM).

Mezzanine financing comes in at this junction then. Most loans are made with a 12-14% coupon, and some combination of an equity buy-in, PIKing, or warrants. Many smaller mezzanine finance firms are SBIAs, which means that they get part of their funding from the government (a large portion is still high net worth individuals and institutional investors) so long as they only lend to companies that meet certain requirements (in the US, where employees are, etc.).

With that basic outline, here are a few general questions that I think will come up so I'll do my best to answer them now:

Who works in the industry?

From what I've seen, the industry tends to be dominated by former senior lenders with investment bankers and corporate management types sprinkled in. Because Mezzanine lending focuses on the credit perspective, it's not too surprising that commercial lenders tend to transition into the space.

How do funds make money?

The 12-14% interest rates on loans are not high enough for funds to be successful. The extra money that makes a good firm profitable usually comes from identifying good portfolio candidates who will grow at a steady rate. The two main ways of benefiting from a company's success are through equity co-investments and warrants. Generally, equity co-investing is standard procedure when a company has demonstrated the ability to grow consistently and is a lower "risk". Warrants are essentially free upside in the equity of a company and are used when a company's credit profile might be weaker.

What are the hours like?

Generally very reasonable. Interning, I was putting in about 40-50 hours a week. Although the fund was small, I'd say everyone else was putting in about 10-11 hour days during the week with a few additional hours (maybe 3-5ish) on the weekend. Obviously hours depend with deal flow, but I'd say that's standard in this line of work.

What will I make?

As a lowly intern in a very small firm, I didn't have the cojones to probe people who could be my parents/grandparents on what they make. I have met people who came from BB banking programs as associates and work in the industry, so comp has to be competitive. Maybe someone else can chime in on this for me.

Will I get to flew my excel modeling muscles?

Yea buddy!

Will I be making powerpoints?

Hell no!

Feel free to let me know if you have any other questions and hopefully this was a useful primer.

56 Comments
 
Best Response
theparadoxTo be specific - the most interesting aspect to me was the equity kicker that is used to hit the target IRR. Specifically, how exactly firms value warrants. I also wanted to learn about how sub-debt is usually paid off (bullet/amortized).

There's another thing that threw me off while building my model. You guys can point out if I'm approaching this wrong:

To determine the firm's free cash flows (to determine how much debt it will be able to take on), I calculated the unlevered FCF. This involves tax-affecting the EBIT, but taxes take into account the capital structure so if I'm looking at a scenario with different levels of debt/different interest rates, is there a better way to incorporate the interest tax shield?

here are a couple of free resources on debt. the bank loan info is better, although, maybe not what you're looking for. https://www.lcdcomps.com/d/pdf/LoanMarketguide.pdf https://www.lcdcomps.com/d/pdf/hyprimer.pdf

regarding the valuation of warrants - you just value them like equity. you're getting a specified % claim on the equity value of the company (these are usually structured like options with a strike price above which they are "in the money"). if you have warrants for 5% of a company with a strike price of $100M equity value and the company is sold for $200M equity value, you get 5% of the $100M gain = $5M. you just plug that $5M and the timing into your IRR calculation. I think most funds would run a full LBO-type model to value the total equity of the company and the implied value of their warrants, but I suppose you could also use some type of option pricing model.

regarding paydown for sub debt, it is usually a bullet at maturity. the reason for this is that the secured bank loan lenders don't want junior/sub debt being paid back before the secured loans are completely paid back. this is one of the reasons that sub debt gets paid a higher interest rate. if you are talking about a mezzanie sub debt deal, then mezz deals are a lot more "bespoke" like someone else mentioned. a mezz lender can essentially structure their security any way they want as long as it doesn't conflict with the terms of other debt that is already outstanding and it conforms to existing securities law.

to build a model to determine how much debt a company can take on, at least for leveraged finance situations, you don't really need to look at an unlevered FCF metric (that is more of a tool for DCF modeling). you look at credit ratios like debt/ebitda, debt/(ebitda-capex), debt/FCF, ebitda/interest expense, (ebitda-capex)/interest expense to determine how high the debt burden is relative to the income/"cash flow" of the company and you build a projection model that shows you if the company is paying off debt over time and deleveraging. if you run your projection model with an assumed debt load and the company doesn't have any cash flow because its interest expense is too high and it doesn't pay off any debt, than the company probably can't sustain that much leverage and you need to bring the debt level down.

 

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (68) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”