18 Comments
 

Didn't realize Android and YouTube are still under the google umbrella, wonder why? Seems like a good move though, increased visibility and therefore clearer valuations, from an investor's perspective

 

It's not a "shakeup" at all. I don't really see how much has changed, other than the fact that Sundar will lead Google's "bread and butter" business.

 
"procrustes"

I know there's a theory going around that Twitter reached out to Sundar Pichai to become their CEO, and this was Google's counter.

On an unrelated note, it'll be interesting to see how this plays out legally considering that BMW owns both the domain and trademark to Alphabet.

I wonder the likelihood that a judge will uphold a contested trademark of such a common word. How can you trademark the word "alphabet"? It predates BMW by at least a millennium. If I'm a judge there's no way I let BMW have exclusive use of the word. You worried about brand confusion? Don't pick a word used by every pre-schooler in the Western Hemisphere.

Can I trademark the word "Tree" or "Shoe" and reasonably expect trademark protection?

Array
 

I just checked and more than one company has trademarked "Alphabet". The trademark has to do with its use relating to a specific good or service. For example a company had it trademarked for Vodka and another for a desk.

I don't think a judge would conclude that Google's use would infringe on BMW's use. Also, they made it clear that Alphabet is not becoming a brand, it is a holding company. Trademarks are supposed to prevent brand confusion.

"yeah, thats right" High-Five
 
"Virginia Tech 4ever"
procrustes: I know there's a theory going around that Twitter reached out to Sundar Pichai to become their CEO, and this was Google's counter.
On an unrelated note, it'll be interesting to see how this plays out legally considering that BMW owns both the domain and trademark to Alphabet.

I wonder the likelihood that a judge will uphold a contested trademark of such a common word. How can you trademark the word "alphabet"? It predates BMW by at least a millennium. If I'm a judge there's no way I let BMW have exclusive use of the word. You worried about brand confusion? Don't pick a word used by every pre-schooler in the Western Hemisphere.

Can I trademark the word "Tree" or "Shoe" and reasonably expect trademark protection?

Doesn't change the fact that BMW owns Alphabet.com

 

Seems like a good way for Google to clarify and emphasize their business segments to investors. It could also mean that Google wants its shareholders to start thinking of the company as more than a search engine that also works on cutting edge tech, and more as a diversified tech company.

 
Best Response

These are just my personal opinions only. I can see why Google have gone for the holding company model.

1) Capital Allocation: As Google continues to grow, it makes senses that the founders are moving forwards to the conglomerate model. It also means that they can spend time making more strategic decisions rather than focusing on one particular company where there are multiple businesses bundled together. For example, internally, they can allocate capital to start new firm that help Google grow without sidetracking the main search business.

2) Managing Talents: As they have done with naming a new CEO for Google, we can see the firm is carving out various businesses into separate legal entities (i.e. Google Ventures, Google X). This allow the founders to give out more CEO titles. In a firm like Google, after you have maxed out on compensation, a bit ego boosts might help (i.e. a lot of current Senior Vice President will become CEOs of new business entities). This will allows all the talented executives to continue to work for the Google (or Alphabet holding company), rather than starting out their new businesses and competing against Google.

4) Capital Markets: Having separate companies, analysts can rank each firm better and give a better rating. This will make it a lot of easier to raise capital down the road. There are clearly a few businesses who are draining cash out of Google while a few that can survive on their own. This will allow a good segmentation of various businesses under Google - making it easier for both the bankers and investors to work with. Furthermore, in term of investors relations, with this new structure, investors will have a much clear understanding of how Google operates; thus will be able to better manage their expectations. This will provides more stability in their stock.

 
"Harvey Halstein"3) Capital Markets:
Having separate companies, analysts can rank each firm better and give a better rating. This will make it a lot of easier to raise capital down the road. There are clearly a few businesses who are draining cash out of Google while a few that can survive on their own. This will allow a good segmentation of various businesses under Google - making it easier for both the bankers and investors to work with. Furthermore, in term of investors relations, with this new structure, investors will have a much clear understanding of how Google operates; thus will be able to better manage their expectations. This will provides more stability in their stock.

To me, this seems to be the overarching reason for the organization.

Array
 

I guess the real question is how many people are actually going to think of Alphabet as Alphabet and not just Google still?

make it hard to spot the general by working like a soldier
 

Not to mention it allows these tech companies to be more "versatile" and retain that "startup" feel, which basically just means the people in charge are being trusted with more autonomy rather than having to jump through more hoops from people with 30 degrees of separation from their business and product. It's probably a really good move.

 

Eligendi aut autem asperiores magni excepturi cupiditate. Sint provident aut et. Animi consequatur atque sed qui sunt. Ullam laborum explicabo odit voluptates.

Perspiciatis illum quia et illo consequuntur similique non. Rerum qui unde quia alias modi est distinctio. Est quas consequatur occaecati exercitationem quisquam repellat voluptas ut. Rerum dolorum nihil cum illum iure fugit.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (67) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”