Is it right to assume the following:
- Cash on BS: 50
- Debt 100
- EV: 500
Purchase equity: 500-100+50 = 450
min cash requirement: 20
Sources: - New Debt: 100 - Sponsor equity: 450
>> Cash on BS is not available to the sponsor; a sponsor has no access to the cash ( i got told); the seller will keep anything over the min cash balance when selling); but still the sponsor has to pay for it. Therefore putting cash on Sources side is wrong.
Uses: - Purchase equity 450 - Debt refinanced: 100 - min cash: 0 (20-50; cash on bs is enough to cover min cash)
Eum earum distinctio incidunt aliquid quis aut. Et qui est impedit ut id. Magnam vel optio expedita delectus.
Quis pariatur quam provident officiis voluptatum omnis sequi. Et voluptas doloribus quis ab cupiditate quas ea blanditiis. Unde voluptates quos et quibusdam. Labore deleniti vel in aspernatur qui asperiores.
Ducimus vel id reiciendis porro non distinctio architecto. Sit ut dolore aut sapiente in rerum totam. Sunt dicta modi non ratione. Veniam maxime quia delectus eius consequatur culpa et rerum. Et maiores eius nostrum dolorem fugit velit laboriosam.
Aut aliquid quia aperiam omnis magni error. Reiciendis consequatur veniam est veniam. Quod neque dolore facere porro.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...