Which of these is best for MF/UMM PE recruiting?
I know two of the banks here are tech groups but for buyside I don't really care about whether it's tech PE or some other industry focus as long as it's a well known MF/UMM shop where I can make $$$.
| +106 | Is Everyone Too Bearish on PE? | 34 | 23h |
| +48 | Why would anyone do PE in long term in 2026? | 13 | 1d |
| +35 | MF Tech PE 2026 | 7 | 20m |
| +24 | Q&A: What It’s Actually Like Working at an Independent (Fundless) Sponsor | 4 | 3d |
| +22 | Do you think PE has actually helped you become a better entrepreneur? | 8 | 15h |
| +21 | Striking out in last rounds | 2 | 4d |
| +21 | UMM PE or High Paying Strat Finance? | 13 | 1d |
| +16 | Portfolio Marks | 8 | 12h |
| +15 | DELETE | 1 | 2d |
| +15 | Overwhelmed by amount of data / granularity | 3 | 2d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
I scrapped data for IB firms PE ASO worked at for MF/UMM and def seen way more CS LA (REGAL & Sponsor) than LAZ SF Tech and EVR MP Tech. Caveat is that LAZ and EVR are likely smaller groups so unsure on a per capita basis. Also, many firms don't have a people's page for their ASOs.
CS LA is also pretty small with a class size of 5-7. Not sure how much smaller LAZ and EVR can get
Nam sint blanditiis blanditiis. Voluptatum deserunt est consequatur ut.
Cupiditate et ut natus aut voluptatem dolorem sit. Ut repellat qui nam est ipsum autem. Nam labore voluptas sit rem alias deserunt. Quia quis pariatur perferendis repellendus iure. Quia culpa sunt quam.
Saepe dolores neque asperiores omnis adipisci vel beatae. Maxime sed a velit dolorem et quia. Harum omnis nobis qui tenetur aut asperiores iure.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...