Hi all,
I'm pretty poorly versed when it comes to private equity and leveraged buyouts. But how is it that when Elon buys twitter, the company now has debt on its balance sheet?
| +187 | London MF REPE is paradise | 10 | 4h |
| +28 | The Difference Between a Good Business and a Good Acquisition | 7 | 2d |
| +19 | My Work Products Get 95% There, is that a failure or somewhat expected? | 14 | 11h |
| +18 | Career / Life Crossroads | 5 | 2d |
| +14 | Opinions on DTCP? | 5 | 1d |
| +14 | Partners misalignmet common? | 4 | 4d |
| +11 | on-cycle possible after lateraling? | 2 | 2d |
| +10 | PE Associate Recruiting from a PE Analyst Program | 3 | 1d |
| +9 | What to do - advice needed for incoming 27 associate | 2 | 3d |
| +9 | Capital Introduction | 0 | 5h |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
I think the best analogy for a leveraged buyout is this: you want to buy an apartment with debt. You rent out the apartment and make sure the rent is covering the principal + interest. In this case, the owner is musk, the apartment is twitter, the paying participant is the company itself who isn't recording 'rent revenues' but advertising revenues.
Does this make sense?
Yes that makes sense. I buy something, at least *partially* with debt, and then pay the interest with the cash flows from that thing. I didn't realize that in an LBO that debt is actually paid down (i.e. the "principal" is reduced?), though. Moreover, I just would've thought that if Company A uses debt to buy Company B, that that debt would go on the purchaser's balance sheet (Company A).
Sunt voluptatem ex consequatur mollitia. Id omnis iste asperiores non aperiam.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...