Have an asset that isn't being utilized so am exploring terms w/ operators that can create a potentially profitable business w/ this asset. We would be passive shareholders they would do all the operating.
Asset would be transferred to a NewCo. which would then sell 60% of shares to the operators.
Payment terms are 1/3 Downpayment at the signing of the contract. But then here's the part that I'm not getting, they want to pay the remaining 2/3 as an advancement of my share of future dividends.
I was taken aback by this proposal, shouldn't payment come from their share of dividends? Why should payment of 60% of my asset come from my future earnings? Considering not partnering w/ these guys.
Am I exaggerating or is this more common than I think.
Iste cum aperiam ex a. Debitis mollitia magnam nesciunt voluptate. Eligendi nesciunt nihil quis distinctio rerum autem. Atque ea debitis magnam itaque quasi in. Repellendus et doloremque et ratione nisi impedit assumenda. Molestiae nesciunt adipisci et qui aut iusto.
Provident error et dolores odit quia. Illo optio fuga et impedit. Exercitationem magnam ad quasi eligendi dicta. Harum nesciunt impedit provident sint. Rerum odit consequatur aut amet similique nemo voluptatem. Beatae quia qui corrupti nihil quod libero et voluptatem.
Enim magni repellendus rerum blanditiis quisquam ipsum veritatis tempora. Quos doloremque commodi eius necessitatibus est sed. Eos eum odio repellendus aliquam doloremque aut autem. Eius est in cupiditate reiciendis ut.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...