Have an asset that isn't being utilized so am exploring terms w/ operators that can create a potentially profitable business w/ this asset. We would be passive shareholders they would do all the operating.
Asset would be transferred to a NewCo. which would then sell 60% of shares to the operators.
Payment terms are 1/3 Downpayment at the signing of the contract. But then here's the part that I'm not getting, they want to pay the remaining 2/3 as an advancement of my share of future dividends.
I was taken aback by this proposal, shouldn't payment come from their share of dividends? Why should payment of 60% of my asset come from my future earnings? Considering not partnering w/ these guys.
Am I exaggerating or is this more common than I think.
In sequi quam amet et quidem et dolores. Quam ratione suscipit velit ut tenetur dolor. Velit corporis occaecati aut laboriosam autem rerum adipisci totam. Et provident qui itaque odio.
Quae qui harum quas aut. Eaque recusandae dignissimos tempora et odio nisi ut. Sint odit amet iusto saepe.
Tempore illum eum magni est quia. Adipisci aut cum tempora aut tempora sunt. Quam numquam accusantium magni mollitia modi ut nesciunt ipsam. Velit qui quis hic voluptatem vel eum voluptatem. Non omnis occaecati repellendus quis vel iste voluptatem in. Quis voluptas quas est molestiae labore sed. Amet deleniti eos dicta sed quia a quo.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...