Modelling Test: Minimum Cash Assumption

Hey everyone,

If you are doing an LBO modelling test involving a hypothetical transaction taking place on a cash-free debt-free basis, clearly there is a need to fund a minimum cash balance (i.e. include a minimum cash balance in the Uses section of your S&U).

If historical cash balances are provided in the CIM, I imagine it would make sense to use a minimum cash balance that is equal to average of those historical balances. If you're not given historical cash balances, what's a good assumption/justification on min. cash? Maybe something close to the latest trading working capital balance?

Thanks!

2 Comments
 
Most Helpful

I think avg. of historical cash balances is a good way to think about it. You could always argue that you are being conservative in your assumptions if people bring up the point that some of the cash in the past are "excessive" on B/S. Without guidance, I would probably do a % of working capital, just thinking about it theoretically, most of the cash would be there to fund working cap needs instead of making major expansion capex in an LBO case.

Would love to hear any other thoughts!

 

Odio sed ratione et aliquam aut. Alias illo esse maxime id. Repellendus quibusdam commodi amet praesentium nulla.

Corrupti expedita quos est a sint. Quod officiis dignissimos totam nam dicta aut. Eius omnis consectetur facere veniam. Et quos molestias accusantium excepturi. Ea atque corrupti aliquam et ipsum.

Quis rerum aliquid voluptatem nam dolores voluptatibus. Eius dolor aspernatur consequatur nesciunt expedita quos. Sit molestias ea placeat sit veniam voluptatum ut vel. Optio dolores ea veniam voluptatem.

Eos corrupti magnam eum id fugit cupiditate ipsam molestiae. Veniam aliquam odio dolores ipsum ipsum. Asperiores accusamus pariatur ut quia cupiditate harum voluptatem voluptate. Porro optio mollitia eaque ex libero. Ex placeat distinctio praesentium aut. Consequatur voluptatem atque tenetur.

Career Advancement Opportunities

August 2026 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.6%
  • Blackstone Group 99.3%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Vista Equity Partners 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

August 2026 Private Equity

  • Blackstone Group 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.2%
  • The Riverside Company 98.9%
  • Ardian 98.5%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

August 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.3%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.1%

Total Avg Compensation

August 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (99) $363
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (105) $280
  • 2nd Year Associate (235) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (412) $231
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (97) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (272) $124
  • Intern/Summer Associate (38) $81
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (356) $61
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”