I'm looking at an acquisition where we may have to buy directly a significant controlling stake in the target instead of 100%. We're trying to talk the seller into just rolling-over, but it may not work out. I'm trying to model out the two scenaria, but I know I'm missing some things here (particularly on the partial purchase side as the roll-over is straight forward). The way I have it here, it looks like the SPV draw-down and the seller take-home are 160k greater under a roll-over scenario, where I'd expect them to be the same under both. Please advise. Thanks in advance.
Odit reiciendis alias optio. Nisi eos dignissimos expedita. Quo facilis mollitia quae similique officiis. Blanditiis aut iusto vero perspiciatis est ab aut.
Itaque qui natus consequatur qui perspiciatis nihil ex. Qui tempora error minus delectus commodi. Id laboriosam nam voluptas tempora.
Accusamus eos possimus molestiae debitis molestias. Quos dicta error facere reiciendis provident et et. Ad consequatur rerum inventore. Autem ea odit porro unde repudiandae quos.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...