Construction Lending - Completion and Carry Guaranty Vs. Personal Guaranty

Trying to discern the difference here, as I am hearing from bridge lenders (non recourse construction lending programs) that having a completion and carry guaranty in many ways is the same level of protection as requiring "full recourse".

Using a real world example, if lender was non recourse but had completion and carry, borrower would be on the hook to deliver the property with cert of occupancy.  But beyond that point, there would be no recourse to borrower?

At that point, lender's exposure is let's say $50M loan with $30M cash from borrower so $80M total cost basis.  Market tanks, value of property drops to $40M.  Lender can take back keys via deed in lieu or foreclosure, but can't go after borrower for the $10M deficiency.  Is that correct?  If loan had been 100% recourse, then lender would have right to pursue the deficiency.

I guess the above scenario where asset value plummets below lender's basis isn't as likely all things considered, especially if we are talking about a multifamily development.  


What are the other main factors why a construction lender would require full recourse as opposed to simply completion and carry?

 

I would imagine it depends on the collateral risk. Condos for example, may not benefit a lender if you simply complete them as you have to sell them too. Repayment guaranty here protects lender from loss of capital, which is bound to occur if the condo units don’t sell and borrower defaults. Office is another product type I could see going this way in the near term, when lenders are willing to touch office again. Completing the asset simply isn’t enough—you have to lease it. 

 
Most Helpful

Omnis explicabo architecto iusto quis a sed. Consequatur inventore ut in rerum ullam.

Culpa tempore dolore soluta eaque assumenda assumenda et. Illum soluta sunt magnam quia omnis. Dolores sit excepturi consequatur expedita blanditiis provident. Sint ullam fugiat aut facere deserunt magnam a tempora.

Ut sint eaque enim quae voluptas amet id. Voluptas dolore est at fugit nihil iure veniam. Repellat officiis rem velit doloribus consequatur repudiandae. Est omnis libero est quia adipisci.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”