EBITDA per SQM or SQF

I am looking at a research report on a home builder, in one of the emerging market countries. The business model is simple - build a large apartment block and sell it down to individual customers, flat-by-flat.

The report (done by a BB firm) mentions, that an important gauge of execution quality for a home builder is - EBITDA per square meter (or foot) - that it achieves historically.

Out of pure curiosity, in what way (if any), is simple EBITDA MARGIN worse than EBITDA per square meter? to assess the quality of execution for a developer.

In my view, ultimately, both measures assess the profitability of the developer.

Any informed advice would be greatly appreciated.

3 Comments
 
Best Response

Look at it this way: the goal of using either EBITDA margin or EBITDA PSF is ultimately to allow you to figure out the profitability (where profit is defined as EBITDA) of a company based on a given input. For EBITDA margin the input is sales, for EBITDA PSF the input is square feet.

The question of which might be more helpful is based on which input you feel more comfortable projecting. For most operating businesses, you generally project out sales. Say for McDonald's, you might figure out what same-store growth will be over the next few years (factoring in GDP growth, pricing power, etc.) and how much additional top-line growth can be attained through new stores (or lost from closures).

For a homebuilder things are different. Sales don't typically grow linearly as they do with other operating businesses. Homebuilders have pipelines of developable land, and you'll look to that to figure out what volume of development they might have over the coming years, and will think about profitability from that angle. Also, you're trying to evaluate the profit from a particular development. As a developer, you can't just sell an unlimited number of units and grow by a percentage rate each year, you're capped out by the size of your lot and the buildable square footage. So in looking at the potential profit on a development deal, you'll want to determine the profit on each saleable square foot.

 

Magnam illum eos quisquam voluptatem vitae dolores labore doloremque. Et modi qui et sint corporis aspernatur.

Stay curious

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (67) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”