Liquidity Constraint - sourcing deals

How do sponsors/developers with a sub $1M net-worth get deals done on the acquisition or development side of the business? Will be challenging to do a deal that is $20M due to liquidity constraint from a lender that requires a borrower to meet a certain liquidity profile. Would be great to know how syndicators or developers deal with this issue. Thanks!

9 Comments
 

I’m curious about this too. I was going to make a post about it but I’ll add my questions here. It sounds like having a co-GP or paying a fee to the LP to flash liquidity and meet the guarantee is a viable option. What about deposit requirements? How do low net worth developers navigate these lender requirements? It’s tough for the little guy to shell out one or two million bucks just to sit in a checking account for a year or two until the guarantee burns off at CO. Not to mention any partner putting up cash as a deposit (whether it be the sponsor/developer or a Co-GP or LP) has significantly watered down their returns now. Whoever puts it up will want to be paid at least the pref return for it I imagine? 

 

I’m referring to a literal deposit in a checking account with the lender as a loan requirement. Here’s a rough example from a deal I’m familiar with: $50 million loan with a liquidity requirement of $10 million and a deposit requirement of $2 million. Sponsor has to maintain a $2 million deposit with the lender until a certain milestone (maybe CO? I don’t remember exactly). That $2 million is just sitting there doing nothing, earning no return. For big high net worth guys maybe this isn’t such a big deal. But for the little guy starting out I would imagine you’d try to do everything in your power to waive that requirement and just have net worth and liquidity requirements with no deposit requirements. Then you could get a Co-GP to sign and give him a point plus share in the promote for singing guarantees. 

 

Quis distinctio corporis cupiditate nisi delectus exercitationem et omnis. In asperiores et accusamus dignissimos. Libero hic est placeat non. Accusantium accusantium doloremque laudantium id eveniet odit et vel. Provident et minima vel vitae laboriosam.

Rem in eum voluptatem tenetur. Nulla minus quasi necessitatibus consectetur autem.

Qui fugiat quae quos dolores. Temporibus quis aperiam ut rerum sapiente aliquid eligendi. Ad eius eos neque labore.

Quibusdam eligendi placeat consequatur quia. Distinctio nesciunt sed esse ea itaque qui sint. Dolores quibusdam rem esse aut est.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (78) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (72) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”