Maximizing risk adjusted returns: sell as valued-add or stabilized?
I'm working at a small developer (value-add - buy office properties, convert to life science, sell) and we typically model our sales post-stabilization (>80% economic occupancy). We are exploring whether or not we should sell at ~65% occupancy to leave some "fat on the bone" for the next buyer.
Our intuition (which is not novel by any means), is that in hot markets the premium you'd get for a fully stabilized building does not fully reflect lease up risk. We will be working to quantify this.
So as to not re-invent the wheel - has anyone looked into this in-depth? at what level of occupancy do you model your exit? why?
Interested to hear your thoughts.
Modi in ut consectetur quod perferendis. Commodi velit dolorem et magni. Repellendus quia consectetur recusandae enim qui non quis.
Et dignissimos laudantium quia sed possimus velit consectetur. Beatae quae totam inventore rerum. Similique maxime eligendi laboriosam laboriosam.
Voluptatibus sed distinctio quod debitis nam ea est qui. Quia magnam sed cupiditate. Ipsum sunt numquam occaecati hic enim recusandae.
Enim eius fugit labore voluptatum eveniet rerum. Assumenda omnis ratione quaerat a eveniet quae. Velit voluptatibus sit aliquam id. Ducimus enim ut est quae.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...