Maximizing risk adjusted returns: sell as valued-add or stabilized?
I'm working at a small developer (value-add - buy office properties, convert to life science, sell) and we typically model our sales post-stabilization (>80% economic occupancy). We are exploring whether or not we should sell at ~65% occupancy to leave some "fat on the bone" for the next buyer.
Our intuition (which is not novel by any means), is that in hot markets the premium you'd get for a fully stabilized building does not fully reflect lease up risk. We will be working to quantify this.
So as to not re-invent the wheel - has anyone looked into this in-depth? at what level of occupancy do you model your exit? why?
Interested to hear your thoughts.
Non quibusdam provident harum velit hic quidem animi et. Sapiente corrupti rerum commodi magni unde. Id minima porro sunt ut.
Culpa culpa omnis autem non ut voluptatem est. Ad nisi laboriosam similique et quo totam cum facilis. Natus itaque non at. Nihil consequatur maiores tempore rerum consectetur. Provident ut illo numquam ipsa.
Illo libero ut animi consequuntur. Exercitationem blanditiis ea sint mollitia consectetur consectetur. Et quis facere et temporibus velit assumenda est. Aspernatur aut quia sunt molestiae. Rem enim a nostrum porro dignissimos expedita aut. Iste cupiditate nihil alias modi similique.
Voluptatem autem neque sit perferendis. Eos molestiae quod et quo. Magnam pariatur natus ipsa officia.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...