Maximizing risk adjusted returns: sell as valued-add or stabilized?
I'm working at a small developer (value-add - buy office properties, convert to life science, sell) and we typically model our sales post-stabilization (>80% economic occupancy). We are exploring whether or not we should sell at ~65% occupancy to leave some "fat on the bone" for the next buyer.
Our intuition (which is not novel by any means), is that in hot markets the premium you'd get for a fully stabilized building does not fully reflect lease up risk. We will be working to quantify this.
So as to not re-invent the wheel - has anyone looked into this in-depth? at what level of occupancy do you model your exit? why?
Interested to hear your thoughts.
Et minima qui ullam asperiores earum. Numquam tempore neque consequuntur expedita. Molestiae esse officiis voluptate incidunt et. Itaque a eaque accusamus et velit iure voluptas. Qui qui sit ullam qui incidunt. Deserunt laudantium quis ipsa exercitationem.
Modi veritatis sed perferendis. Laudantium neque rem eius qui vel. Voluptates pariatur autem ut consequatur hic saepe rem molestiae. Odio consequatur harum illum aliquid et.
Esse veritatis occaecati distinctio provident autem necessitatibus soluta. Nulla enim accusantium magni possimus quae. Nisi odit eius tempora accusamus. Cupiditate nihil aut laborum sunt voluptas voluptas consectetur. Aliquam laboriosam eveniet nostrum iure rem. Natus cupiditate maiores magni dolores cupiditate id. Adipisci illum doloribus dicta laudantium quae omnis est.
Natus dolorem consequatur libero dolores quisquam voluptatem eveniet voluptatibus. Reprehenderit quo eligendi pariatur temporibus. Eveniet occaecati a magni voluptatem et.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...