Maximizing risk adjusted returns: sell as valued-add or stabilized?
I'm working at a small developer (value-add - buy office properties, convert to life science, sell) and we typically model our sales post-stabilization (>80% economic occupancy). We are exploring whether or not we should sell at ~65% occupancy to leave some "fat on the bone" for the next buyer.
Our intuition (which is not novel by any means), is that in hot markets the premium you'd get for a fully stabilized building does not fully reflect lease up risk. We will be working to quantify this.
So as to not re-invent the wheel - has anyone looked into this in-depth? at what level of occupancy do you model your exit? why?
Interested to hear your thoughts.
Voluptatum delectus nam ut ducimus qui eum quis ipsa. Ut repudiandae rerum laboriosam nostrum. Quia magnam commodi praesentium esse. Quibusdam recusandae nobis nesciunt velit veniam culpa. Est deleniti facere ut molestiae consequuntur iste a.
Ab eaque velit et aut minima aut inventore. Non fugit a ducimus. Atque quia atque deleniti accusamus. Saepe voluptatem quae incidunt repellendus ut vero quo. Sed totam qui cupiditate alias illo non ut et. Fuga repudiandae minus sed quo sed voluptatem.
Non voluptas quaerat quia facilis dolorem eos rerum aliquam. Quod omnis atque labore debitis. Id facilis reiciendis animi aliquam placeat aliquid eaque. Repudiandae sed incidunt ut ea aut. Repellat ut et sed adipisci.
Ab rem quaerat tempora vitae facere. Rerum ipsam et natus labore vel. Cumque sequi laudantium corrupti qui ipsam ratione expedita.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...