MBA worth it in CRE?

Was hoping I could get some views from folks who have gotten a top tier MBA in the real estate industry.

Is it worth the time and money?
If not one of the M7 should you just skip the MBA?
Which MBA programs would be the best?
If you're already an analyst/associate at a pere 100 what benefits would an MBA provide?

Thanks for any thoughts y'all may have.

 
Most Helpful

I went the MBA route. My situation was a bit unique as my employer would pay for 100%. I found that the majority of people who were getting their MBA and wanted to focus on RE out of school were either trying to break into RE from a different industry, trying to move to an acquisitions position from a asset management or other position, or trying to move into a MF or national developer from a smaller or more regional firm. I would say those candidates made up the vast majority of my RE focused MBA classmates. There were a handful of my classmates that were coming from PERE top 10 firms with goals to pivot to a different property type or geographic market.

All the questions you asked are too personal for a stranger on the internet to give a "good" answer. It can be worth the time and money. There are MBA's outside of MBA business schools">M7 that are great for real estate as real estate is still a very relationship driven business. UNC Flagler is a great example of this. The best MBA program depends on where you would want to work after you graduate. If you are already at a PERE 100 an MBA could allow you to change to a different company, change to a different group, or demonstrate yo your department head you are better prepared to lead a team and advance internally.

This is a really personal decision.

 

So, see the below, I actually posted this as a comment to a similar question months ago, then re-posted again to a similar question. It is still applicable.....

So someone asked something similar a few weeks ago.... here is what I said, still applicable

"*Here is the general deal with grad degrees right now..... TONS of people are getting them, especially MBAs but increasingly specialized MS degrees like MSF, MSRE, MSRED, etc.

So basic economic theory applies, the greater the supply, the lower the value all else equal. Are firms "demanding" these degrees, short answer, "sort of", but that goes to next point....

The more people have a grad degree, the less unique advantage any particular person will get out of it, BUT, those without are at a greater and greater disadvantage. Hence, the grad degree is becoming the new BS/BA degree (decades ago, simply getting a 4-yr degree gave people the same leg up a grad degree is supposed to do today).

Here is what is happening in the real world. Firm posts a job requiring a BS/BA degree, gets 100 applicants, 10 have grad degrees. Guess who (sometimes) gets interviewed first....

Now, seeing the success of hiring people with grad degrees (sometimes at rates barely more than what people with BS/BA degrees want) they change the job post.... Requires BS/BA, graduate degree PREFERRED. Now, 100 applicants, maybe 50 have grad degrees, want to guess who will get called or not called?

That is the shitty truth of it, the value is eroding, but need is increasing. My advice, if you are young/junior and still establishing yourself, you should probably plan on getting a grad degree if most people along that same path (think about those 5-10 yrs senior to you) have them.

Further, many big firms require them for promotions, making partner, etc. and people do get a passed over for lacking a piece of paper (even if otherwise qualified). That is the world we live in.

If you are okay potentially staying at smaller, entrepreneurial firms (which are common in RE), then not having one may never matter, but your option are theoretically more limited."*

To add on...

The MBA vs. MSRE debate often misses the point. The content is different, and that really is what should be factored. If you already work in CRE and basically know the content (which you should not just assume), then getting a degree that doesn't expand knowledge or skills is not the best path (the 'certification' and network still has value). I honestly don't think employers actually think MBA > MSRE, in fact in many cases MSRE > MBA. The fact that it's hard to get hired at BX and places like that, and they DO hire from HBS and the like when then hire gives people an overconfidence about those MBA programs. Trust me, going to HBS/Wharton/etc. and getting an MBA even if top of class is not a guarantee of an analyst/associate role at one of those 'top tier' firms, they are just super competitive to start.

 
redever:
So, see the below, I actually posted this as a comment to a similar question months ago, then re-posted again to a similar question. It is still applicable.....

So someone asked something similar a few weeks ago.... here is what I said, still applicable

"*Here is the general deal with grad degrees right now..... TONS of people are getting them, especially MBAs but increasingly specialized MS degrees like MSF, MSRE, MSRED, etc.

So basic economic theory applies, the greater the supply, the lower the value all else equal. Are firms "demanding" these degrees, short answer, "sort of", but that goes to next point....

The more people have a grad degree, the less unique advantage any particular person will get out of it, BUT, those without are at a greater and greater disadvantage. Hence, the grad degree is becoming the new BS/BA degree (decades ago, simply getting a 4-yr degree gave people the same leg up a grad degree is supposed to do today).

Here is what is happening in the real world. Firm posts a job requiring a BS/BA degree, gets 100 applicants, 10 have grad degrees. Guess who (sometimes) gets interviewed first....

Now, seeing the success of hiring people with grad degrees (sometimes at rates barely more than what people with BS/BA degrees want) they change the job post.... Requires BS/BA, graduate degree PREFERRED. Now, 100 applicants, maybe 50 have grad degrees, want to guess who will get called or not called?

That is the shitty truth of it, the value is eroding, but need is increasing. My advice, if you are young/junior and still establishing yourself, you should probably plan on getting a grad degree if most people along that same path (think about those 5-10 yrs senior to you) have them.

Further, many big firms require them for promotions, making partner, etc. and people do get a passed over for lacking a piece of paper (even if otherwise qualified). That is the world we live in.

If you are okay potentially staying at smaller, entrepreneurial firms (which are common in RE), then not having one may never matter, but your option are theoretically more limited."*

To add on...

The MBA vs. MSRE debate often misses the point. The content is different, and that really is what should be factored. If you already work in CRE and basically know the content (which you should not just assume), then getting a degree that doesn't expand knowledge or skills is not the best path (the 'certification' and network still has value). I honestly don't think employers actually think MBA > MSRE, in fact in many cases MSRE > MBA. The fact that it's hard to get hired at BX and places like that, and they DO hire from HBS and the like when then hire gives people an overconfidence about those MBA programs. Trust me, going to HBS/Wharton/etc. and getting an MBA even if top of class is not a guarantee of an analyst/associate role at one of those 'top tier' firms, they are just super competitive to start.

It’s a bit off topic but to expand on this, I do think a grad degree is the new college degree due to the growing prevalence of these credentials. I think for many of us, it’s a good trend and also an incentive to not get into heavy debt for undergrad (unless for a top tier university).

Let me explain. When you are a 17 - 18 year old, who knows what your potential earning power is? Likely, you don’t know your field of study. You don’t know how you would fare in the work world. Are you driven or want a lifestyle career.

Usually before you apply for a grad degree, say the MBA / MSRE at a reputable school, usually you do have a sense of what you want to do, what you are good at, and identify potential paths for career growth, and likely you have saved up some money. Now is the time to really bet on yourself and invest, and spend the money if your goals are defined (usually your grad school applications and references are supposed to validate that).

Great ”follow on” if you attended a non-target undergrad. I call it follow on because in the grad school dominated world of the current and future; you can bloom later and still achieve. In fact, if my kids couldn’t get into a top university (obviously would love Cal or Stanford); I’d be happy if they attended my alma mater in Hawaii (state school $13-17k/yr tuition) and experienced life there and really crush their classes and grow. I’d want them to try many things and latch onto something that interests them (hopefully with a career in mind). There would be another swipe of the card if they prove to be talented and resourceful, with grad school.

With that context, when is the tipping point where having a grad degree is a distinct advantage for the so-called post-MBA jobs at institutional firms (I’m thinking. associate level)? I think it was between 2010-2016 for CRE. Also to give context, a grad degree holder is more likely to hire another grad degree holder, especially if that boss needed it for their hiring way back. It validates them. Human nature. Hence, this trend is likely not going to reverse itself.

I’ll add. The majority of my peers at the REPE when I was an analyst, and even at a highly institutional development shop, the ones who resisted getting a grad degree the most were those from real estate families, and they had some idea of one day returning to the nest. For those of you without that, it’s the Jungle out there. It’s up or out. Unless you can walk on water, credential up.

Have compassion as well as ambition and you’ll go far in life. Check out my blog at MemoryVideo.com
 

Not meant to derail the thread, but I have seen a lot of guys come out of MSRE and MBA programs that land analyst roles.

Is that common? Say they are 25-28 when they graduated, why take an analyst role? I can see the argument for taking an analyst position at a MF or something, but why go through grad school when you'll come out as an analyst at some sponsor or LMM firm? Can't the same be done via networking?

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Lazard Freres No 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 18 98.3%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 04 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (20) $385
  • Associates (90) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (67) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”