Question - Debt Service Shortfall Advances

Hi all, wanted to get your thoughts / see if anyone has seen something similar.

I'm in asset management and we have two properties under one financing structure (comprising a senior position and mezzanine note, split 80%/20%). The senior position was sold to another lender at loan closing a few months ago and the origination lender still holds the mezz piece.

The loan provides that the lenders will fund 70% of all debt service & carry shortfalls (up until the holdbacks are exhausted). One property is half leased and the other is still vacant (these were lease up plays), so when the loan servicers run the monthly debt service waterfall, the rent from Property 1 partially offsets the interest that would have been attributable to Property 2 as well. We also have interest rate cap payments coming into the lender lockbox directly.

Every month, we front the 30% of the DS&C shortfall with our equity and the lenders cover the balance of 70% (further split 80%/20% senior/mezz).

The issue we're running into is that no one seems to know how to attribute the DS&C advances between Property 1 and Property 2. This is important because there are technically eight holdbacks that we can draw upon - Property 1 DS&C, Property 1 TI/LC, Property 2 DS&C, Property 2 TI/LC; each split senior/mezz - and we're trying to project out when each bucket will be exhausted. To date, the lenders have just been drawing against the holdback from the larger of the two properties but we've all agreed that that doesn't make the most sense.

I've talked to both the senior and mezz lenders, both their servicers, and internally with my seniors and we're all sort of just pointing at each other. The loan docs are also vague on this point. I think we're all leaning towards making this as simple as possible (% of purchase price or whatever) but I'm curious if anyone else has come across something similar? Sorry if this was a bit unclear!

1 Comments
 

Quis eos et nihil qui similique. Facere quia ut ab qui quas assumenda. Eaque excepturi veniam nobis eos ullam animi. Quia molestias voluptatum corporis repudiandae voluptatem numquam quae. Veritatis et esse et dolorem voluptates voluptatem quasi. Tempora qui beatae aut in.

Accusantium ea tempora aut quam. Veritatis quos eos ut qui. Ducimus sint provident ut molestiae delectus dolorem aut veritatis. Ipsa et amet exercitationem quod dicta praesentium. Autem voluptas debitis impedit ab repellat nemo. Earum eum aperiam sequi optio omnis sunt. Consequatur necessitatibus quidem nihil est atque.

Career Advancement Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.9%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (53) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (15) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”