Been following the real estate industry for a while. Which REPE funds do both corporate and asset-level investments? Also, is there any fund that invests in both equity and debt? Thanks!
| +30 | Is RE cooked for the medium term? Feels like it | 5 | 6h |
| +24 | Thoughts on institutional RE investment advisory roles — between the LP and GP? | 5 | 2d |
| +22 | Untrended YoC - Construction Escalation Included? | 11 | 11h |
| +22 | New to real estate - how to start? | 6 | 1d |
| +18 | Early career advice. | 9 | 4d |
| +17 | Best WLB in RE Originations? | 10 | 1d |
| +16 | LIHTC Developer Comp | 3 | 5d |
| +12 | The Capital Bifurcation: Private GPs are handing the keys back to Public REITs | 3 | 15h |
| +7 | Analyst Comp | 11 | 5d |
| +7 | Harrison Street | 5 | 1d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
bump
Also interested
Generally equity and debt strategies are separated and I can’t think of any funds that are raised across both. There can sometimes be overlap if a debt fund wants to buy a bond that they want the equity team to underwrite in case they have to own it.
Large companies will do both but under different ultimate funds. The equity sources for debt vs equity or corporate vs assets are different so rarely would you have a fund of any meaningful size raised to do both.
There are obviously "exceptions that prove the rule" one example would be pref equity/mezz debt people. Often these guys are playing within the same risk spectrum (and have similar equity sources) and often do both although most have either a pref equity or mezz bent as the pref equity guy usually has development/operational experience.
Do MFs like TPG RE and BX RE invest in c-corp? Thought BX RE just bought a stake in Great Wolf Resorts.
Yes, KKR has an ownership stake in their operating partner, Drawbridge Realty. This may be wrong, but I believe BX has the same type of structure in their industrial operating platform, Link Industrial Properties.
It's become more common at the "Mega-Fund" level for the LP to have an ownership interest in the operating partner. Other examples include when BX bought EOP or Hilton.
The whole key to REPE 'strategy' as it is considered, is to be be nimble and somewhat unconstrained. This is a function of a firm's ability to raise capital. BX more or less gets to do what it wants and will jump from office bldgs to SFHs to industrial or whatever as it did last 15 years. So, I think your question implies a premise that doesn't really exist.
That said, some firms have teams and expertise that focus on certain asset types and/or transaction types, so they tend to be bounded by their expertise. That is only a short term constraint.
REPE has been in the 'lead' for about 15 years in terms of cost of capital, in part, due to being able to be flexible. Before that it was the REITs, the dominant players and strategies can and do change with time in RE.
Goldman 1st/2nd year analysts work on both debt and equity investments. Additionally, since the firm also invests off of its balance sheet in deals (separate from their commingled funds) they do both corporate and entity level investments. For example, look at the iQ student housing deal was a perfect example of both corporate and entity level investments.
Eum aut voluptatem ut ratione perferendis incidunt magnam. Veritatis et beatae nihil accusantium. Tenetur qui ut dolores hic recusandae libero hic veniam. Nihil cupiditate officia quisquam ab est ut sapiente.
Et illum omnis iure neque est ducimus est. Magnam non sit eum ut et possimus. Consequatur eos nihil ea distinctio soluta. Necessitatibus corrupti qui fugiat quia explicabo blanditiis iusto. Qui aut aliquid pariatur velit amet nobis. Ea ipsam qui omnis veritatis accusamus.
Non non sit odio magni dolor. Quam et libero beatae cum nobis ipsa consequuntur. Est dolor temporibus qui eligendi. Voluptate nesciunt suscipit sint pariatur.
Eius minus assumenda dolores. Ipsa a inventore accusamus at sunt dolores ex. Ea aliquam est adipisci aperiam.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...