Reason JP Morgan is not as strong in the GSE space as Wells/Cap One?
Is there a strategic reason JP Morgan is not as active (is it intentional?) in the GSE lending space compared to banks like Wells/Cap One? From the outside looking in, the GSE business can be a takeout source for their in house construction/bridge loans. The business can be profitable with little risk. I know they have a big balance sheet lending group specifically for MF assets that compete with the GSE's. Is this the main reason?
Based on the most helpful WSO content, it's not explicitly stated why JP Morgan may not be as active in the GSE lending space compared to banks like Wells Fargo or Capital One. However, it's mentioned that GSEs (Government-Sponsored Enterprises) like Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac play a significant role in the economy, particularly in the housing market. They provide services to an underserved part of the economy and can be a source of capital in crunch times.
However, GSEs also come with their own set of challenges. They can be easy to exploit and their reliance on capital markets can exacerbate market downturns. It's also mentioned that GSEs could potentially undergo reform, but it's unlikely they will ever go back to being private entities.
As for JP Morgan, it's not clear from the context provided why they may not be as active in the GSE space. It could be due to a variety of strategic reasons, risk management considerations, or other factors specific to the bank's operations and objectives.
For a more accurate answer, you might want to reach out to someone who works in the GSE space or at JP Morgan. They could provide more insight into the bank's strategy and operations.
Sources:
It is a new team for the org. I don't believe there is any balance sheet lending group just focused to MF. There are groups dedicated to affordable though.
JPM is new to the GSE conventional lending business. They got in a couple years ago and spent time building their back office. They are now starting to build out the origination team (which could be attractive to someone frustrated by senior bankers at their company that “own” all the top sponsors).
JPM has been a prolific MF middle market lender (portfolio term loans) in select markets (mostly West and East Coasts). The GSE program will give them term loan programs to expand their offerings across the nation and provide larger loans than available through their legacy MF program. They can leverage their portfolio to drive business but like most Bank backed GSE lenders, are limited to their own products and unable to clear the market. Of course, they don’t have an MF investment sales platform to funnel in lending business as has been successfully employed as a strategy by most major GSE groups either.
The way this market seems headed, it’s hard to say if these limitations will matter. We could easily see a market where the GSEs and private capital are the only game in town. If that’s the case, a fortress bank with a GSE program is a good bet.
Est sit ratione soluta temporibus accusamus voluptatum molestiae earum. Non non debitis animi consequatur ullam ea corrupti. Ut maxime occaecati esse expedita numquam amet.
Id assumenda unde praesentium et tenetur explicabo. Aspernatur sed quisquam at nesciunt.
Est veniam commodi facere facere et. Placeat omnis explicabo quia molestiae quas cupiditate. Incidunt laudantium blanditiis dicta animi eligendi omnis. Officiis expedita sed aut vel.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...