Based on the most helpful WSO content, discussions around success fees on equity raises often revolve around the structure of the fee, whether it's a flat rate or a tiered percentage. The example you've provided is a tiered structure, which is quite common in the industry. This structure incentivizes the party raising the funds to secure as much capital as possible by offering a higher percentage for the initial tranches of capital and then reducing the percentage as the amount raised increases.

Here's a breakdown of how the tiered structure works, using your example:

  • For the first $10 million raised, the success fee is 3.0%. This means if $10 million is raised, the fee would be $300,000.
  • For the second $10 million (amounts from $10,000,001 to $20,000,000), the fee drops to 2.5%. So, if an additional $10 million is raised (making it $20 million in total), the fee for this tranche would be $250,000.
  • For any amount exceeding $20 million, the fee further reduces to 2.0%. Therefore, if $30 million in total is raised, the fee for the amount above $20 million (which is $10 million in this case) would be $200,000.

This tiered structure is beneficial for both parties. It ensures that the entity raising the funds is adequately compensated for the first, often more challenging, capital raised, while also aligning their interests with the fund-seeking entity by reducing the fee percentage as larger amounts are raised, making the deal more attractive to potential investors.

In contrast, a flat percentage rate is simpler and easier to understand but might not provide as much incentive for maximizing the fundraising effort. The choice between a flat rate and a tiered structure often depends on the specific circumstances of the deal, including the amount of capital being raised, the difficulty of the raise, and the preferences of the involved parties.

Remember, the key to structuring success fees is to align the interests of all parties involved, ensuring that the fundraising efforts are adequately rewarded while also providing good value to the entity seeking the funds.

Sources: When does the promote split actually occur?, How are you structuring equity split on personal deals?

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

Neque sed in odio reiciendis quis ea. Ut deserunt possimus neque veniam. Et dolores libero cupiditate voluptate. Rerum odio qui excepturi. Eum architecto necessitatibus consequatur illum autem molestias.

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”