Why Does REPE Underperform?

https://www.cambridgeassociates.com/benchmark/rea…

Real estate private equity has put up an annual return of 7.39% over the last 25 years vs. 10.95% for the NAREIT Equity Index. This is troubling because real estate private equity has put up subpar returns with a much higher risk profile.

Opportunistic and value add investment strategies typically have: -More leverage -Greater development and execution risk -Greater refinancing risk -Greater reinvestment risk -Greater market risk -Poor liquidity

How is it that the buy and hold core/core plus investment strategy utilized by most equity REITs has outperformed for so long with such modest leverage?

3 Comments
 
Best Response

EDIT: Just read footnote on page you're referencing which basically disclaims that they are comparing apples to oranges.

Haven't dug into data, but a few points that could explain this: (1) REITs don't generally go to zero. (Relatively) conservative leverage profiles and public market liquidity have ensured that few REITs have had their equity go to zero, whereas a number of large real estate funds had their equity wiped during the financial crisis. (2) Kind of related to number 1, but property values have generally risen over the last 25 years. As long as you were conservatively capitalized and didn't get wiped out as some point, you generally made money. (3) Timing. Not sure what 1992 looked like (as I was still eating glue at the time), but 9/30/17 had some very high REIT valuations. Also, not sure what the size of the REIT universe was in 1992 as the industry really came into its own through the 90s. Prior to current cycle, height of REPE fundraising was in lead-up to recession (heavy skew towards low/negative returns).

 

Saepe in et a vero quis ut accusantium. Consequatur deleniti et sapiente quasi nam dicta. Non nemo modi deserunt sit.

Career Advancement Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 08 97.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.2%

Professional Growth Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.2%

Total Avg Compensation

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (47) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (25) $178
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (83) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (74) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”