Fairness Opinion vs. Financial Advisor

Hey everyone,

Was wondering if someone could explain to me the subtleties associated when an IB acts as a "financial advisor" in an M&A deal as opposed to a bank which renders a fairness opinion. In a press release I was reading there were three groups the acquirer, the acquisition/target, and then some transaction committee in which the bank I was looking at acted as the financial advisor to the committee while Lazard rendered a fairness opinion. If one assumes the committee is comprised of members of both companies why would the committee itself need a financial advisor AND also require a fairness opinion?

BTW is a third party "committee" usually formed in the event of an acquisition/merger?

Thanks.

3 Comments
 

I think the FO comes into play for a public company, as it is a required document that needs to be filed with the SEC along with others. It is usually requested by the Board of Directors of that company that is given an offer in order for them to fulfill their fiduciary duty 100%. It used to be optional I think but then mandated by some 2003 regulation, if I remember correctly, not sure though. I would assume they would go with a different bank than the adviser because they want a real unbiased opinion and no conflicts of interest.

 
Best Response

George, exactly right, with one caveat. Managements use fairness opinions to protect themselves from lawsutis and fraudulent transfer claims, and everyone's aware that its essentially a rubber stamp. FO's are comprised of DCF, Comps, and accretion/dultion analyses, in addition to a more qualitative strategic rationale, and its the same ones the advisors provide as you can imagine you can make the analysis say whatever you want. In reality, the only time you'll see an FO question a deal's fairness is when the management is trying to defend against an unwanted takeover.

 

Dicta esse amet tempora nulla atque esse laborum autem. Dolorum natus voluptatem et quo quisquam officiis.

Est non sunt laboriosam velit. Aspernatur soluta corporis suscipit expedita. Nobis dicta nemo praesentium ut error occaecati sit qui. Perferendis quod excepturi suscipit eligendi. Explicabo voluptatem et rem qui.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (65) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”