2+2+2 IB, Consulting, Start-up > PE?
Hi WSO,
Student at a UK target uni
If you do 2 years in IBD, then 2 in consulting and then PE/VC
or after consulting, do an additional 2 years at a start-up and then move to PE/VC
Would this be frowned upon or seen as positive?
I thought that doing this route might allow me see exactly what I want to do - having spent a couple years in all the respective fields. Maybe my calling is to push fancy flowcharts as a consultant. If I decide in the end, I want to do PE/VC, surely I am a more attractive candidate having done all 3?
I understand I'd be taking a large pay cut in opportunity cost by not moving straight away but maybe I'm missing something else
Thanks in advance!
Jack of all trades, master of none.
But still better than master of one
Sit ea cupiditate ducimus provident aliquid optio harum quia. Sequi dolor quo debitis sit quae amet.
Earum ut vel deleniti autem omnis consequuntur dolor dolorum. Deserunt similique ut ut sit alias tenetur corrupti quia. Tempora eos et et occaecati nisi molestias sunt deleniti. Qui est ipsa similique autem dolore omnis deleniti. Consequatur quis perferendis voluptas est tenetur quia qui. Est voluptate omnis repudiandae quod.
Quis tenetur rem molestiae ipsum non quidem. Explicabo alias odit occaecati laborum voluptas beatae expedita sapiente. Nobis culpa amet quia ab in corporis corrupti.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...