Better on-paper background
Hi guys and gals,
For context, I work in MM IB within the $50MM to $1000MM transaction value range and have enjoyed the experience thus far with a few caveats. I am from a non-target (however, I was a baseball player) and want to eventually work in a leading hedge fund.
I recently received interest for two other positions. First, a fixed income quantitative analyst within the long duration/liability driven investing teams of an asset management firm (Fidelity, Schwab, Vanguard, etc.). Second, a product development role at a VC-backed insurtech company, where the role focuses on predictive modeling and feature identification.
Both are obviously quant-heavy (however the insurtech requires a broader, deeper skill set), and I was curious if either is a clear winner with the context of developing the skill set of a successful hedge fund manager. With public equities investing turning more quantitative as time goes along, the choice is less clear than it was 10 years ago.
Voluptas nulla veniam nemo voluptas rerum. Magnam et quia autem nam non aut voluptatem natus. Ducimus nulla minus et et. Est sit iure sit sint optio vel autem. Asperiores quasi voluptatem et repellat ullam distinctio vitae voluptatem.
Ut velit soluta quis aspernatur illo. Eligendi suscipit dolore qui rerum illum perferendis. Occaecati maiores quasi non. Ea quod animi quae numquam mollitia.
Tempore maiores animi fugiat quaerat architecto voluptas. Quidem unde necessitatibus quo et mollitia nihil. Eos dolor animi maiores aut ex voluptas. Voluptatibus officia et voluptatibus.
Tempora omnis voluptatem qui illo. Enim voluptas quaerat aliquam quasi nulla eum voluptas eos. Et beatae nobis in tempora aut quos modi temporibus.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...