Trending Content
Career Resources
WSO Free Modeling Series - Now Open Through
May 31, 2024
9 Free Financial Modeling Lessons
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
+Bonus: Get 27 financial modeling templates in swipe file
+Bonus: Get 27 financial modeling templates in swipe file
So many questions would go into this theoretical, but to start:
What does the market look like for each product type? Supply? Demand?
What is your strategy with development? Merchant build? Long term hold? What are cap rates for that product type?
What "fits" on that plot in terms of where the neighborhood currently is and where it will be in 5 years/10 years/etc.? What is the highest and best use?
What do you/your company have expertise or experience in? How able are you to execute?
Once you answer those questions, then there are hundreds of others.
This question is more of like a case study that you would get asked in an interview. Given a basic overview of just a growing market, employment is growing YoY, company has expertise in any asset type......just looking for a broad answer with backup to how you come to this conclusion....whether it be based off yields, construction costs, interest rates, whatever it may be. I understand completely it depends on the market and what supply is already there and where that market is going, but this would be more of a broader concept
Assume an urban location though
If you can't ask your interviewer more probing questions and come up with your own creative answer to an interview question like this you don't deserve the job.
Jesus don't overthink it.....
Fine, i'll give you a scenario.
The plot of land is zoned for either commercial or residential, company x is a prolific developer in both office and multifamily, the plot of land is in downtown Charlotte, the plan for the development either way is a long term hold....
What would you develop and why?
I do not work in development, so more so just trying to hear some opinions from people who do or have experienced working for a prolific developer where they had a plot of land and how they decided whether to build office or multifamily.....just looking for an opinion whether its that office is too risky and doesnt produce the yields that multifamily does....or long term multifamily is a safer bet than office....or construction costs for multifamily exceed office so the yields are actually better in office....whatever it may be. I have not been at a company where we had to make a decision to truly find out what is best and highest use for a piece of land that could be either office or multifamily. So just looking for some tips on how someone would come to this conclusion. Obviously at the end of the day it goes much deeper and there is a proforma on both scenarios, but just looking for a broad opinion on what someone has experienced and what truly impacted the decision
CRE
I know you said you work in development on some other threads...have you been involved in this before where your company has either a rundown asset, or a plot of land in an urban location, and had to decide whether to build office or multifamily? just looking for what factors come into play - i understand supply is a big thing, how are current office properties doing vs multifamily, what are the yields for each, how have previous developments in the area done leasing up....just looking for professional experience in something like that and what they experienced and what ultimately drove the outcome
Honestly, no.
For one, we don't just happen to own land. We buy it when we need it for a purpose. That purpose is either to build multifamily or a mixed-use project that incorporates multifamily, because we are multifamily developers.
Second, we never think "oh, I bet we should build an office building here" when looking at land, because if office is the highest and best use, we're not buying that land. At most we will partner with people or companies that have expertise in different uses, like when we build town center deals that incorporate multifamily, single family, retail, and office uses.
The situation you are describing would be very rare in my experience. A good situation to be in, mind you, owning a terrific urban site that works for a number of different uses, but a rare one.
If it made sense, probably senior living. Just finished our first senior living deal and I will probably never go back to apartments.
How come?
Less risky tenant profile, better yield (in comparison with my previous deals), various tax exempt bonds available as financing options at the moment. Those are just my reasons for liking senior living projects.. I definitely understand why some people dislike it/think its boring.
Far more likely to die on you
Its more of an operating business though, like a hotel. Not a typical RE investment with little management/staff requirements.
Multi family BDSM unit
@CRE12345 The answer is whatever is a) legally permissible b) physically possible c) financially feasible and d) maximally productive. That is the whole point of a highest and best use analysis.
Yea i agree....put it in this scenario, you have an older office building in downtown Manhattan, its run down and needs to be redeveloped. The parcel is zoned for either residential or commercial. I understand going through the proforma and actually running an analysis is how you decide. Say you can develop roughly 400,000 of RSF, given an office property in manhattan rents may be $85psf mfg, giving a total GPR of $34m, now take that same 400k of RSF, say you can develop roughly 445 units (AUS of 900+/-), and the average rent is roughly $3500/unit. So at 100% occupancy your GPR is $18.7M. So office is nearly doubling in potential rent.Then going in deeper you anlayze expenses, and occupancy, and all of those factors, i get that......But what other factors would contribute? Does anyone know how construction costs vary? Is it in fact more expensive to build a Class A office mid/high rise compared to a class A multifamily? Idk, thats why I am asking the forum
It depends, If you're building a spec office building your total costs are partially a function of TIs. If you're filling your building with law firms, the total costs will likely be higher than multi, but if your leasing to call centers, your costs will probably be lower.
It seems like what you're trying to get at is which option has the better risk adjusted return. If you can legally, physically and feasibly build both, I think the multi is the better option than a spec office because it's less risky and the return will be decent. On the other hand, if you have a large tenant in tow, say amazon or google, who is willing to sign for 50% of the office space, damn well sure you're building that office.
Whatever the equity wants
Don't let your LP boss you around like that
I was going to say this too lol. Whatever the equity who pays the best split wants built there.
ah yes the golden rule, he who possesses the gold makes the rules
Damn right!
multifamily
Voluptas qui placeat magnam. Maxime sapiente occaecati qui quo optio eos.
Et dolor eveniet quos dicta consequatur. Assumenda qui perferendis repellendus deleniti facilis quia tempore. Rerum deserunt aliquam et voluptatibus illum fugiat.
Rerum et culpa nisi rerum. Est nemo officiis sunt perferendis dolor esse sequi. Earum aut dolores ad quis quaerat illo illum commodi.
In non recusandae beatae sunt eos est. Iure qui quia iste laudantium nostrum iusto. Dicta nobis quia commodi ut excepturi nesciunt. Eligendi vel at ea. Dolor possimus alias quisquam.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Fuga a illum assumenda qui a mollitia. Ex voluptatibus minima sunt inventore error. Impedit et dignissimos deleniti vitae. In error hic qui expedita odit eos quam neque.
Et dolore assumenda sunt molestias vel. Nulla qui commodi ipsa quia quaerat autem. Quia ipsum ut non asperiores est dolores et. Est aut in laudantium repellat dolor. Non enim eos sunt sunt.
Quas temporibus et sapiente enim. Asperiores facilis officia recusandae ut consequuntur dicta. Accusamus voluptatibus veritatis eius corrupti ex accusamus voluptatem.