In IBD, I would say most BB associates have an MBA. The ratio is probably 4:1 based on my experience (curious what others have observed). This is largely because most analysts are either good at it, and get an attractive opportunity to leave, or hate it, and leave anyway (sometimes both). From what I've seen, if you're a decent banking analyst today, the firm tries to keep you but struggles to do so. This is a reversal from an era not long ago (maybe ten years?) when an associate promotion offer was coveted and somewhat rare.
In sales and trading it's quite a bit different. The analyst programs tend to be shorter (two years vs. three), and the majority of S&T analysts seek the associate promotion and try to stay. Unlike in banking, not everyone who wants the promotion will get it. However, the proportion of non-MBAs ends up being much higher in S&T--I want to say it's more like a 1:1 ratio?
MD explained it to me this way once, and I find his rough approximation to be fairly accurate. He divided each analyst class into quarters.
One fourth will want/get the A2A promote and take the third analyst year placing them on track for promotion on the sell side. Another will be highly rated, successful, and competent and therefore be snapped up before their analyst stint ends or leave it with an offer already in hand for awhile. Another fourth will be sick of the industry and have decided finance is not for them (or already anticipated it going in) and have no intention of sticking around after the two year mark. The last are the few who either aim for the MBA right away or who just aren't successful enough to warrant an offer from the firm and essentially get cut.
Hope this breakdown helps.
I am permanently behind on PMs, it's not personal.
One fourth will want/get the A2A promote and take the third analyst year placing them on track for promotion on the sell side. Another will be highly rated, successful, and competent and therefore be snapped up before their analyst stint ends or leave it with an offer already in hand for awhile. Another fourth will be sick of the industry and have decided finance is not for them (or already anticipated it going in) and have no intention of sticking around after the two year mark. The last are the few who either aim for the MBA right away or who just aren't successful enough to warrant an offer from the firm and essentially get cut.
This is amazingly accurate. Depending on the firm, a few more might leave with offers in hand...but overall the breakdown is spot on. Most people that go into banking do not stay around for long.
One fourth will want/get the A2A promote and take the third analyst year placing them on track for promotion on the sell side. Another will be highly rated, successful, and competent and therefore be snapped up before their analyst stint ends or leave it with an offer already in hand for awhile. Another fourth will be sick of the industry and have decided finance is not for them (or already anticipated it going in) and have no intention of sticking around after the two year mark. The last are the few who either aim for the MBA right away or who just aren't successful enough to warrant an offer from the firm and essentially get cut.
This is amazingly accurate. Depending on the firm, a few more might leave with offers in hand...but overall the breakdown is spot on. Most people that go into banking do not stay around for long.
i agree. that is the BEST answer you are going to get
From the European perspective, MBAs are rare. In fact, we've stopped hiring MBAs entirely - they're not as good as direct promotes, and they're more expensive. Before that change, I'd say the ratio was about 5:1 of A2As:MBAs. It's assumed you'll get the Associate promotion if you stick around.
From the European perspective, MBAs are rare. In fact, we've stopped hiring MBAs entirely - they're not as good as direct promotes, and they're more expensive. Before that change, I'd say the ratio was about 5:1 of A2As:MBAs. It's assumed you'll get the Associate promotion if you stick around.
Yeah, but the flip side is everyone has a masters, usually not an MBA but something businessy.
From the European perspective, MBAs are rare. In fact, we've stopped hiring MBAs entirely - they're not as good as direct promotes, and they're more expensive. Before that change, I'd say the ratio was about 5:1 of A2As:MBAs. It's assumed you'll get the Associate promotion if you stick around.
Yeah, but the flip side is everyone has a masters, usually not an MBA but something businessy.
More masters, certainly, but that's coming in at analyst level. Probably half the analysts have masters of some sort.
S&T Associates in Europe don't generally have MBAs, at least from my experience. Maybe 50 analysts come in from UG and 3 or 5 MBAs in every year new hires, and people don't have the need to leave and get an MBA to get promoted. Probably what some people said about everyone having an MEng, MFin etc... at the analyst level is relevant.
Omnis aut consequatur sunt eum neque. Sequi molestiae rerum tempore blanditiis officia corrupti accusantium. Et veritatis suscipit distinctio quasi. Aut suscipit ad consectetur consequatur. Debitis quae dolor quidem quibusdam. Debitis eos vitae necessitatibus magni tempore dolores iusto. Totam dolorum magni amet saepe eligendi doloremque.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
Sorry, you need to login or sign up in order to vote. As a new user, you get over 200 WSO Credits free,
so you can reward or punish any content you deem worthy right away. See you on the other side!
In IBD, I would say most BB associates have an MBA. The ratio is probably 4:1 based on my experience (curious what others have observed). This is largely because most analysts are either good at it, and get an attractive opportunity to leave, or hate it, and leave anyway (sometimes both). From what I've seen, if you're a decent banking analyst today, the firm tries to keep you but struggles to do so. This is a reversal from an era not long ago (maybe ten years?) when an associate promotion offer was coveted and somewhat rare.
In sales and trading it's quite a bit different. The analyst programs tend to be shorter (two years vs. three), and the majority of S&T analysts seek the associate promotion and try to stay. Unlike in banking, not everyone who wants the promotion will get it. However, the proportion of non-MBAs ends up being much higher in S&T--I want to say it's more like a 1:1 ratio?
MD explained it to me this way once, and I find his rough approximation to be fairly accurate. He divided each analyst class into quarters.
One fourth will want/get the A2A promote and take the third analyst year placing them on track for promotion on the sell side. Another will be highly rated, successful, and competent and therefore be snapped up before their analyst stint ends or leave it with an offer already in hand for awhile. Another fourth will be sick of the industry and have decided finance is not for them (or already anticipated it going in) and have no intention of sticking around after the two year mark. The last are the few who either aim for the MBA right away or who just aren't successful enough to warrant an offer from the firm and essentially get cut.
Hope this breakdown helps.
This is amazingly accurate. Depending on the firm, a few more might leave with offers in hand...but overall the breakdown is spot on. Most people that go into banking do not stay around for long.
i agree. that is the BEST answer you are going to get
From the European perspective, MBAs are rare. In fact, we've stopped hiring MBAs entirely - they're not as good as direct promotes, and they're more expensive. Before that change, I'd say the ratio was about 5:1 of A2As:MBAs. It's assumed you'll get the Associate promotion if you stick around.
More masters, certainly, but that's coming in at analyst level. Probably half the analysts have masters of some sort.
Most... yes for sure
S&T Associates in Europe don't generally have MBAs, at least from my experience. Maybe 50 analysts come in from UG and 3 or 5 MBAs in every year new hires, and people don't have the need to leave and get an MBA to get promoted. Probably what some people said about everyone having an MEng, MFin etc... at the analyst level is relevant.
Omnis aut consequatur sunt eum neque. Sequi molestiae rerum tempore blanditiis officia corrupti accusantium. Et veritatis suscipit distinctio quasi. Aut suscipit ad consectetur consequatur. Debitis quae dolor quidem quibusdam. Debitis eos vitae necessitatibus magni tempore dolores iusto. Totam dolorum magni amet saepe eligendi doloremque.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...