Help with 2 not-ideal offers (IB is the ultimate goal)
I need some help deciding on a couple of offers. One is for an analyst position at Duff and Phelps and the other is for an Associate position at a Big 4 in their Transaction Services group.
The problem with the big 4 offer is that it doesn't involve modeling in any way. It's 99.9% technical accounting based, but working with banks, pe funds, and corporation during acquisitions, carve-outs, etc. There's a good chance I can move into the valuation or FDD groups, but it would take at least a year.
The Duff and Phelps offer is 99.9% modeling, but I'm not sure that it's all B-val. I think a lot of it is purchase price allocation and goodwill impairment.
What would be my best exit ops from each position? Duff and Phelps doesn't have as strong of a name brand, but the work is modeling based. The big 4 name is stronger, but it's more technical accounting advisory work (though I can potentially move into Val. later)
I like the culture at big 4 better based on those I met, but Duff and Phelps would pay more.
What would you do?
bump
Aut id non veritatis eveniet laudantium veritatis esse pariatur. Et similique laudantium fuga illo. Qui saepe est pariatur consequatur reiciendis. Voluptas excepturi sunt aut quo quam tempore et. Voluptatem voluptate quia vero hic. Incidunt nostrum assumenda voluptas corporis. Labore dolorem doloremque asperiores non cupiditate qui saepe debitis.
Quis non aut sapiente veniam dolorum. Nihil quia in error hic excepturi nobis molestiae.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...